In the fine Brazilian tradition of complications having complications, a couple of follow-ups on follow-ups: I briefly posted a follow-up yesterday about the Doom GPL release (story) theorizing that the original story was inaccurate in saying that it would now be possible to sell games based on the Doom source under the GNU General Public License, but it turns out this is indeed the case, so the correction was incorrect. Tim Aidley pointed this out so quickly I just yoiked the follow-up, but I wanted to note it here in case you saw it in the brief time it was up. Also, A whole load of Tom Clancy fans wrote in saying they do not believe the Rainbow Six novel was based on the game, but no one seems to have concrete proof, so lets just say tie goes to the runner or something. The important thing is to keep the darn terrorists from winning (to complete this bizarro follow up with another Brazil reference, it can be pointed out that terrorism is due to "bad sportsmanship").