![]() |
|
|
|
Send
News. Want a reply? Read
this. More in the FAQ.
News
Forum - All
Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines |
It was pointed out to me I didn't comment on the Deflategate ruling, not that
everybody is hanging on my opinions about such things, but I did have something
to say about the origins of the case (thanks j.c.f.). I don't think my take is
very radical: It seems there was a pretty strong circumstantial case against
Brady, and that the collective bargaining agreement allowed the league to make
the ruling it did, so I'm surprised the court decided to fall back on the merits
of the case rather than the authority of the commissioner. I'm also not sure how
it benefits anyone to create a situation where cases like this may continue to
end up in the courts going forward, though the near-monopoly of the NFL does
suggest that adult supervision is prudent. My ultimate takeaway is that this is
a Pyrrhic victory for the Patriots, as while Brady will not be suspended, his image has taken another hit, and a lot of the Teflon has come off in
the process. I think he has lost most of his Captain America aura outside
of New England, and I don't think that's unfair... I can't imagine Roger Staubach involved in such a scandal.
|
![]()
![]()
Copyright © 1996-2016 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2016 James "furn" Furness &
Blue's News.
All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.4.0/blue++: Page generated 18 August 2016, 14:44.
Chatbear Announcements.