![]() |
|
|
|
Send
News. Want a reply? Read
this. More in the FAQ.
News
Forum - All
Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines |
Thanks to all of you who shared opinions on the color scheme issue I asked about
yesterday, the input is appreciated (it also really looks like the bug that
clogged up the messageboards so often seems dead, yay). Certainly the suggestion
a few offered to enable custom color schemes is worth exploring, but I was (and
still am) interested in facts and theories relating to light on dark text versus
the reverse as it relates to ease of viewing and eyestrain. One of the more
interesting responses suggested that the two don't go hand-in-hand, and a screen
that is easiest to read doesn't mean it's not more prone to causing a strain on
the eyes, but I'm not sure what color scheme a site should use if this is the
case, but anyway... Finally, while recapping this stuff, one of the responses
suggested that many pages went black way back when as a
protest to support free speech, and this is indeed when this site originally
changed from a white background to a black one (this was either 4-5 years ago or
during the McCarthy hearings, I forget which). the other interesting note that
came up about page design was the theory that sans serif fonts are actually
desirable for body text on monitors (which once again, reverses the logic that's
been taught for centuries now in the print world).
Link of the Day: URent-a-Relative.
Thanks Ant.
|
![]()
![]()
Copyright © 1996-2016 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2016 James "furn" Furness &
Blue's News.
All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.4.0/blue++: Page generated 17 August 2016, 20:25.
Chatbear Announcements.