From:
Tom McLeod III
Subject: Mailbag essay inspired by Fruit of the loon comment
I will preface this by stating
that there is an intentional shift between the discussion of server
level vs. consumer level products; the closing quote from the inspiring
post walks this same line.
Below is a quote from a
message posted in Fruit of the loon discussing his decision to install
Windows 2000. Full message at:
http://www.bluesnews.com/cgi-bin/blammo.pl?mode=mboard&action=viewpost&id=6086#MSG_6086
The author discusses performance
and reliability comparisons, about the advantages of UNIX variants over
Windows 2000. I don't have any real issues with any of that, but at
the end he adds this comment:
> Unix is extremely user-friendly.
It just chooses its friends very > carefully. Win2K is very friendly
too, but in a trailer-park whore
> kinda way.
If Windows 2000 as a server
(or workstation) is really that much easier to learn and use than UNIX
(I'm not sure that I necessarily agree), then one could easily extrapolate
that it would certainly become more popular than UNIX. Performance is
important, but it is not the only factor in the decision making process
of a business, especially as performance differences narrow.
However, to move to the consumer
side of the spectrum, the quote sounds no different from saying, "NASCAR
automobiles are extremely user-friendly. They just choose their friends
carefully. Dealership bought automobiles are very friendly too, but
in a trailer-park whore kind of way."
It's this mentality that
seems to be holding back computers from being more widely used. If more
of the already intelligent die hard Linux-supporters/developers were
more cognizant of the needs that computers could serve for people who
have no desire to understand how they work (putting them at a level
equivalent to driving a car (or, more accurately, using a TV or microwave)),
the industry as a whole would have far more places to grow, and will
become more useful in these areas a lot sooner.
This will happen eventually,
and already is, with commercial support based distributions like Redhat
becoming economically practical, but this "better than thou"
mentality is why operating systems conceived of ease of use (e.g., Windows,
Mac OS) will continue to dominate the consumer market for some time.
My thought is that certain
Linux distributions will eventually reach this ease of use and become
more popular, and many avid Linux proponents will proclaim "I told
you so." When, in reality, it could have happened so much sooner.
Thanks,
Tom "Epstein"
McLeod
I agree with you, but
remember - the easiest OS doesn't always become the most popular. Microsoft
Bob anyone? :)