Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Brian Pelletier
Raven | Project Leader | Oct 27 2000, 12:46:38 (ET) |

Name: Brian Pelletier
Description: Project Leader/Art Director
Project: Star Trek

Here is a question I got from a German magazine and I thought it would
be interesting to share.

(German mag) Most of the Elite Force consumers say that the game was
a bit to short. What do you think about this? Why is the game so short?
Are there any concrete reasons?

(Me) In my opinion, there are two possible reasons, and here is the
first one:
Most of the consumers you're hearing from are hard-core FPS players
and most of them are playing on Normal difficulty, which wasn't suppose
to be the desired difficulty setting for them. This setting is actually
the easy mode with challenging being the medium difficulty and what
experienced players were intended to play. There is a HUGE difference in
difficulty between Normal and Challenging. This is our fault in our use
of terminology, as we originally only had 3 difficulties (Normal,
Challenging and Hard, easy to figure out that Challenging is medium since
there are only 3) and then we added the easy difficulty in the last month of
the game development, which was basically an effortless difficulty mode.
We left the terminology the same assuming most experienced players would
play a game in a mode called challenging, but in hindsight if I saw a
game that had a mode called normal, that's what I would play. This again
is our fault for trying to be cleaver with our naming and also make the
inexperienced gamer Star Trek fan (who wanted to play the game) feel like
a "normal" game player.
From my experience with the game testers we had come into Raven, along with
our internal testing and feedback we get from other average game players is
that it will take well over 15 hours to play the single player storyline
game for a casual gamer. The hard core FPS gamer takes a lot shorter to play
because of the nature of how they play shooter games, which is fast, furious
and running through the levels to get to the next. Average gamers are much
slower and not as good, and since we are also creating a game for the average
player and Star Trek fan, we didn't want to make it too hard for them. So
because the game is a little easier to play for hardcore players on top of
the fact that they are playing on easy difficulty, made for one of the
reasons why I believe the game was short for those types of gamers.

I'll post reason number 2 on Monday which is more of a development and
technical issue and in my opinion the real reason of why it is shorter
to play than we wanted it to be.




About Elite Force's teammates.

We all know everyone has their own opinions and we have heard that
Elite Force's teammates are revolutionary and surpass any teammates
done for other games and we also heard that the teammates were nothing
new and they had problems and didn't really work that great. I would
have to disagree with the later and say that the teammates could have
easily been a hindrance to the gameplay and now I know why no other
company has ever tried to make a FPS game with up to five teammates
Working alongside you at one time. At one point in the final stages of
developing the teammates, I wasn't sure if they were going to work out,
they just had so many problems and every time we would fix something
another problem would crop up. Just getting them to follow you was not
an easy task and something we tweaked with all the way up to the final
days. Sure we could get them to follow you but the game took place in
tight hallways and small rooms so you would be bumping into them, they
wouldn't get out of your way, they would constantly get stuck on each
other and they followed the player like a heard of sheep. Also making
them always follow the player everywhere caused problems with them
feeling like real intelligent characters so sometime we had to have
them stand their ground or take up a position while the player went
exploring. Then we had the consistent problems of the team not even
following you and you might need one of them to open a door for you to
later on and when we did get it to work someone eventually found a new
way to break a level with a teammate. Plus with elevators and teleporters
there were always problems with how a teammate could get left behind.
It was getting to a point where we weren't even certain if we could get
them to walk through an entire level and we might have to do something
drastic. Luckily it never came to that and we were able to get them
working in the levels. They may have ran funny to catch up to the player
or jumped down long elevator shafts to stay in formation, but at least
they stayed with the player through the whole level no matter what kinds
of crazy stuff they player was doing. Then came the problem of trying
to balance the combat with the teammates. We started getting our enemies
in the levels and the teammates were so good they killed most of the
enemies leaving not much for the player to do. So we didn't have them
shoot as often but then THEY were constantly being attacked instead of
the player, and the game combat became shoot the aliens attacking your
teammates, which was not fun. So we had to balance the combat so the
player still felt threatened by enemies attacking them and teammates
helped but not to the point where they did all the work and eventually
we got something that felt really fun for the player. It's funny now
when I hear people say that the teammates were stupid because they hardly
killed any enemies or that the enemies always attacked the player but
hardly the teammates; If they only knew how not fun the gameplay would
have been had we not balanced it out the way we did.

Brian Pelletier
- Project Leader: Star Trek Voyager Elite Force

James Monroe 12/9
Zachary Quarles 04/20
Rick Johnson 09/24
Bobby Duncanson 08/24
Pat Lipo 07/10
Kenn Hoekstra 07/8
Brian Shubat 04/19
Scott McNutt 03/19
Mike Renner 03/19
Kevin Long 03/19
Kim Lathrop 03/19
Jarod Showers 03/19
Ben Geisler 03/19
Robert Love 03/19
Mike Gummelt 03/19
Jon Zuk 03/19
Matt Pinkston 03/19
Chris Foster 03/19
Jim Hughes 05/23
Bryan Dube 05/23
Clem Samson-Samuel 05/23
Rob Gee 05/23
Mike Schulenberg 05/23
Brian Pelletier 05/23
John Scott 05/23
Marcus Whitlock 05/23
Eric Turman 03/1
Dan Kramer 03/1
Eric Biessman 03/1
Brian Raffel 03/1
M. Raymond-Judy 03/1
Jake Simpson 08/16
Mike Crowns 03/12
Chia Chin Lee 03/12
Josh Weier 03/12
Jeremy Statz 03/12
Jeff Lampo 03/12
Nathan Albury 01/15
William Mull 11/27
Steve Stringer 05/20

Also Today...


Full list

Visit Webdog today!


Square Eight - Taking over the world and you don't even know it yet! Copyright © Square Eight 1998-2018. All Rights Reserved.
The BlueTracker is provided by Webdog.
We are not responsible for the content of the .plans displayed here.



Blue's News logo