Assault on Dark Athena DRM Backlash

The Starbreeze Forums and Atari Forums for The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena each have threads complaining about the game's DRM, describing a non-revocable three-installation limit that does not allow further installations after it has been reached. This has inspired another protest centered on the reviews on the Amazon listing for the game, where an increasing number of reviews complain about the DRM. We contacted Atari about this and received the following response:
The protection on the PC version of The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena is an activation system with online authentication required the first time you install the game on a machine. The activation code lets you install the game on up to 3 machines, with an unlimited number of installs on each assuming that you don’t change any major hardware in your PC or re-install your operating system.

If you reach the maximum number of installations you can contact the Atari hotline and if it’s a legitimate request you can get a new activation code.

We implement this protection in an effort to avoid early piracy.
View : : :
101.
 
Re: On Dark Athena DRM
Apr 11, 2009, 20:21
Re: On Dark Athena DRM Apr 11, 2009, 20:21
Apr 11, 2009, 20:21
 
You can view this as having no moral base, and that's you perogative, but I prefer to look at it as being rewarded for hard work with greater success and reward.

That's the problem. People don't pay for hard work. They pay for results. Movie tie-ins suck 99% of the time but it isn't for a lack of effort. The developers put in countless hours trying to pump those games out within the ridiculously short dev cycles and for every platform known to man. Does that mean we should all go out and buy every movie tie-in, regardless of quality? No, because that's not how capitalism works. Capitalism is all about results. I'm sure Iron Lore put a lot of effort into their games but people simply weren't all that interested in the results.

Any pirate would have a swift change of heart if they made something a ton of people used and enjoyed and got NO reward out of it.

Pirates do that all the time. They don't get paid to crack games yet they share their cracks with people around the world. What they do is illegal and they put themselves at great risk doing it, as authorities almost always go after the pirate groups instead of individual downloaders. If all pirates believed in capitalism, they'd charge a fee for their cracks. Granted, there are some pirates do sell pirated games but they aren't the ones who actually crack the games. They simply download them, burn them and try to reap the rewards. That is the capitalist way.

No one WANTS to buy anything, that's the problem. It's funny you have such a cynical view on capitalism but later on you seem to have this great optimistic view on humanity... make a good product and they will pay you for it. That's B.S..

If what you say is true, why are movies, music and games still selling? After all, anybody can download all three things with ease. Movies and music have virtually no copy-protection yet they continue to be very successful industries. Games are harder to pirate, yes, but not that much harder. If nobody wanted to pay for them, they would simply download them.

This idea that many on the Internet have of handing out your product and hoping people pay for it is ridiculous, and again if any of you were creators you would think much differently.

It's not ridiculous. Refer to the answer I provided above. It is exceedingly easy to pirate games, movies and music yet hordes of people continue to buy them. If you want to succeed in a capitalist society, your focus should be on getting more people to buy your stuff, not trying to get less people to steal it. Suits always assume that the two are directly correlated but as reality proves, this is not the case.
Avatar 20715
Date
Subject
Author
16.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
12.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
10.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
13.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
38.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
39.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
40.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
42.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
14.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
18.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
69.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
22.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
25.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
29.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
37.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
30.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
41.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
43.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
27.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
34.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
70.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
72.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
28.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
21.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
32.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
50.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
51.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
53.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
55.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
82.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
36.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
44.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
52.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
84.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
85.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
45.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
46.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
57.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
47.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
48.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
54.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
56.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
58.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
59.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
60.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
61.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
63.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
64.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
65.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
66.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
68.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
71.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
73.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
75.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
78.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
81.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
62.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
67.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
74.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
76.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
79.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
80.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
83.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
86.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
87.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
88.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
89.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
90.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
91.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
93.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
94.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
95.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
96.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
98.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
92.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
97.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
99.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
100.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
 101.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
  Re: On Dark Athena DRM
102.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
103.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
107.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
104.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
105.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
106.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
108.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
109.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
110.
Apr 26, 2009Apr 26 2009