Assault on Dark Athena DRM Backlash

The Starbreeze Forums and Atari Forums for The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena each have threads complaining about the game's DRM, describing a non-revocable three-installation limit that does not allow further installations after it has been reached. This has inspired another protest centered on the reviews on the Amazon listing for the game, where an increasing number of reviews complain about the DRM. We contacted Atari about this and received the following response:
The protection on the PC version of The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena is an activation system with online authentication required the first time you install the game on a machine. The activation code lets you install the game on up to 3 machines, with an unlimited number of installs on each assuming that you don’t change any major hardware in your PC or re-install your operating system.

If you reach the maximum number of installations you can contact the Atari hotline and if it’s a legitimate request you can get a new activation code.

We implement this protection in an effort to avoid early piracy.
View : : :
99.
 
Re: On Dark Athena DRM
Apr 11, 2009, 11:10
99.
Re: On Dark Athena DRM Apr 11, 2009, 11:10
Apr 11, 2009, 11:10
 
There is no benefit to the consumer for these DRM methods. None. And you just can't see it.

I never said it did, don't put words in my mouth. It's funny how you can never have a decent debate with someone on DRM without them acting like you love DRM, you think it's awesome. I don't like DRM, especially limited activations and "games as a service" B.S. like Valve throws out there. I would go as far as to say I hate DRM. The difference between you and I is only that I higher priorities than my hatred for DRM, like playing awesome games and supporting awesome developers. If you can't get that simple difference through your head I don't know what to tell you.

The reason to do it is because the system itself does it. Capitalism is all about self-interest. Profit at all costs, even if it hurts others. There is no altruism in capitalism. The greater good is whatever makes you the most money. In the case of customers, it's all about saving money. Publishers like Atari have no problem using worthless DRM to burden customers so why should customers give them anything? If Atari wants to make money, they need to give customers a good reason to buy their games. Preventing theft != making money. In the case of DRM, theft isn't prevented, money isn't made and customers aren't happy.

That's a pretty cynical view, and I'm saying that as a person whose girlfriend constantly admonishes for being too cynical.

Capitalism's main strength is competition and wanting more money, yes. You can view this as having no moral base, and that's you perogative, but I prefer to look at it as being rewarded for hard work with greater success and reward. When people circumvent the system and take your work without giving you anything in return, it breaks the system and removes your incentive. Greater effects could be the closure of a developer, the loss of jobs and resources... it's pretty immoral in my opinion. I'm sure pirates rationalize it to themselves that all those people care about is money, and are thus evil, but that's just B.S. they use to feel better. We all care about money, and we all want our work to be rewarded. Even a nurse or firefighter wants their paycheck and would be damn upset not to get it.

Any pirate would have a swift change of heart if they made something a ton of people used and enjoyed and got NO reward out of it. It's like a college liberal who realizes he's a conservative once he starts making money.

You don't need to beg, you just need to make a product that people want to buy. That's how capitalism works. This isn't about charity. People stealing your stuff doesn't mean anything. People will steal anything if they can get away with it. However, if you make a quality product, a lot of people will feel compelled to buy it. DRM does not compel people to buy stuff.

No one WANTS to buy anything, that's the problem. It's funny you have such a cynical view on capitalism but later on you seem to have this great optimistic view on humanity... make a good product and they will pay you for it. That's B.S..

People don't WANT to pay me for anything. They want to play a game, they want to watch a movie, they want to be rich someday, but the last thing they want to do is reward or pay me for doing anything.

I can't trust people to pay me for what I make anymore than the grocery store could trust people to pay on their way out and have no staff in the store to watch them. This idea that many on the Internet have of handing out your product and hoping people pay for it is ridiculous, and again if any of you were creators you would think much differently.

This comment was edited on Apr 11, 2009, 11:12.
Avatar 54622
Date
Subject
Author
16.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
12.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
10.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
13.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
38.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
39.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
40.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
42.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
14.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
18.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
69.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
22.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
25.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
29.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
37.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
30.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
41.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
43.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
27.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
34.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
70.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
72.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
28.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
21.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
32.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
50.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
51.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
53.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
55.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
82.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
36.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
44.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
52.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
84.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
85.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
45.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
46.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
57.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
47.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
48.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
54.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
56.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
58.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
59.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
60.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
61.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
63.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
64.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
65.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
66.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
68.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
71.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
73.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
75.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
78.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
81.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
62.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
67.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
74.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
76.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
79.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
80.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
83.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
86.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
87.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
88.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
89.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
90.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
91.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
93.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
94.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
95.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
96.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
98.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
92.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
97.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
 99.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
 Re: On Dark Athena DRM
100.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
101.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
102.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
103.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
107.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
104.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
105.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
106.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
108.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
109.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
110.
Apr 26, 2009Apr 26 2009