Assault on Dark Athena DRM Backlash

The Starbreeze Forums and Atari Forums for The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena each have threads complaining about the game's DRM, describing a non-revocable three-installation limit that does not allow further installations after it has been reached. This has inspired another protest centered on the reviews on the Amazon listing for the game, where an increasing number of reviews complain about the DRM. We contacted Atari about this and received the following response:
The protection on the PC version of The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena is an activation system with online authentication required the first time you install the game on a machine. The activation code lets you install the game on up to 3 machines, with an unlimited number of installs on each assuming that you don’t change any major hardware in your PC or re-install your operating system.

If you reach the maximum number of installations you can contact the Atari hotline and if it’s a legitimate request you can get a new activation code.

We implement this protection in an effort to avoid early piracy.
View : : :
92.
 
Re: On Dark Athena DRM
Apr 10, 2009, 13:07
92.
Re: On Dark Athena DRM Apr 10, 2009, 13:07
Apr 10, 2009, 13:07
 
a great bunch of guys with a great game (Titan Quest) that sold like crap but was torrented to hell and back.

This thing was a clear copy of Diablo. How can you say this game failed because of piracy? It failed because it took an old idea and tried to resell it and people didn't want to pay for it.

I picked it up on impulse for $4 because that's about what it's worth to me. If you want top down role playing/action go buy the diablo battlechest, or just bust out your copy that you probably already own. It's absurd to suggest that piracy was why this game didn't sell. It didn't sell because it was a copy of a bigger better product.

Sort of like BF Heroes would be to Team Fortress 2. If EA tried to sell that, even if it was a great game, it'd probably end up selling like shit because people already have a completely superior product and it's been on sale so many times it's probably been sold to 99% of the target market.

3 - Buy the game - I still choose to do this, as being a developer is much harder and thankless than any of you seem to grasp, and they NEED the success and money from game sales to survive. Instead of punishing them for something their publisher did, I support them with a sale and then crack the .exe when I need to... in essence, it is more important to me to support developers making great games I like than it is to complain about DRM I can easily bypass.

And this just makes my head spin. Maybe as a developer you just go along with everything publishers shovel into your mouth but as a consumer we don't distinguish between publishers and developers. It's all one product. If you and the publisher together end up with a shitty product for whatever reason, it's too fucking bad. I think developers have a warped view of reality when they expect gamers to buy games with this kind of stuff attached "for the developers". As if publishers are the ones you need to keep happy. EARTH TO DEVS, it's consumers you need to keep happy.
Date
Subject
Author
16.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
12.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
10.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
13.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
38.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
39.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
40.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
42.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
14.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
18.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
69.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
22.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
25.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
29.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
37.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
30.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
41.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
43.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
27.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
34.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
70.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
72.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
28.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
21.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
32.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
50.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
51.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
53.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
55.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
82.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
36.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
44.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
52.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
84.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
85.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
45.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
46.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
57.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
47.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
48.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
54.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
56.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
58.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
59.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
60.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
61.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
63.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
64.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
65.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
66.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
68.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
71.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
73.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
75.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
78.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
81.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
62.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
67.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
74.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
76.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
79.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
80.
Apr 9, 2009Apr 9 2009
83.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
86.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
87.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
88.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
89.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
90.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
91.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
93.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
94.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
95.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
96.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
98.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
 92.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
  Re: On Dark Athena DRM
97.
Apr 10, 2009Apr 10 2009
99.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
100.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
101.
Apr 11, 2009Apr 11 2009
102.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
103.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
107.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
104.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
105.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
106.
Apr 13, 2009Apr 13 2009
108.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
109.
Apr 14, 2009Apr 14 2009
110.
Apr 26, 2009Apr 26 2009