27.
 
Re: Morning Consolidation
Feb 13, 2009, 16:59
27.
Re: Morning Consolidation Feb 13, 2009, 16:59
Feb 13, 2009, 16:59
 
Nobody ever said VHS quality is all you'll ever need.

The difference between DVD and VHS was monstrous. DVDs didn't degrade like VHS did. They didn't have dust and flicker like VHS did. Most importantly - DVDs allowed you to pause without damage, skip anywhere in the film almost instantly, and ended the pain of rewinding. It gave surround sound and it gave bonus features.

The convenience alone sold the format. Better quality was just a boon.

BluRay offers none of that. Yes, you can argue the higher quality, but it's not apparent on anything less than a 40" TV (insert Dagok Sony rant here.) It makes no sense to buy it for your spare TVs. In which case it makes no sense to buy BluRay discs (although many manufacturers caught on to this and put a DVD version on the back side.) Why buy a disc you can only watch in one place?

That said, if you have a 52" TV it makes plenty of sense. But that's not enough of a reason for it to really catch on. EVERYONE wanted DVD players to get a better picture EVERYWHERE, get the special features on DVDs, and get the easy access the format allowed vs very limited VHS.
BluRay just looks better. At a price. It's a much harder sell. I remember when I bought my first DVD player - my parents couldn't get enough. They're not big gadget people but they'd heard of DVDs and needed a player immediately (even if it involved buying a new surround sound system they never figured out how to operate.)
They have no clue what BluRay is. They likely never will. I bought them a new TV and an upscaling DVD player. This way, when they walk into the video store, they don't rent a disc that they can't play. Considering Blockbuster is almost exclusively DVD, it's just what they'll pick up. No hassle. No worries. Nothing new to learn.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
2.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
3.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
4.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
16.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
41.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
5.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
6.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
10.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
7.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
8.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
9.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
12.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
14.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
11.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
13.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
15.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
17.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
19.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
20.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
23.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
25.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
26.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
 27.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
        Re: Morning Consolidation
28.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
         Re: Morning Consolidation
30.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
42.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
43.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
           Re: Morning Consolidation
45.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
           Re: Morning Consolidation
29.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
         Re: Morning Consolidation
31.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
34.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
           Re: Morning Consolidation
33.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
24.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
38.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
39.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
40.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
50.
Feb 14, 2009Feb 14 2009
22.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
18.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
21.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
32.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
35.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
36.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
37.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
44.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
48.
Feb 14, 2009Feb 14 2009
46.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
47.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
49.
Feb 14, 2009Feb 14 2009
51.
Feb 16, 2009Feb 16 2009
52.
Feb 17, 2009Feb 17 2009