20.
 
Re: Morning Consolidation
Feb 13, 2009, 14:55
20.
Re: Morning Consolidation Feb 13, 2009, 14:55
Feb 13, 2009, 14:55
 
DVD quality is all you need. People need a reality check here. Blu-Ray is just an unnecessary format.

That's your opinion. And I heard the same thing during the transition from VHS to DVD. If you are satisfied with DVD quality, good on ya. There is a huge difference and if you have even a half decent home theatre, DVD quality is NOT good enough.

Like it's already been stated, Blu-Ray is doing better than DVD was at the same point in it's life.

Digital IS the future and it's much sooner than you seem to think.

With what infrastructure? Even the "experts" say it's a minimum 20 years off.

DVD straight to digital is the correct upgrade path.

If you rent only, yes. Do you never want to have your own copies of movies to re-watch whenever? Do you not want extras?

It's for uninformed consumers who are willing to be milked out of yet more money for picture quality that just isn't that much better than DVD.

You must be blind or you actually don't have a decent home theatre. There are plenty of comparison screenshots out there. If you can't see the difference between a blurry face on DVD vs the clear sharp image that Blu-Ray provides. This is an HD vs DVD comparison, but same diff... http://www.dvhardware.net/news/transformers_hd_dvd_vs_dvd.jpg

Let me put it this way...would you play a game at 720x480 when you can get such a massive image quality increase going to 1920x1080? Of course not.

This comment was edited on Feb 13, 2009, 15:03.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
2.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
3.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
4.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
16.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
41.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
5.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
6.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
10.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
7.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
8.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
9.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
12.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
14.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
11.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
13.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
15.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
17.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
19.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
 20.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
    Re: Morning Consolidation
23.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
25.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
26.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
27.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
28.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
         Re: Morning Consolidation
30.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
42.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
43.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
           Re: Morning Consolidation
45.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
           Re: Morning Consolidation
29.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
         Re: Morning Consolidation
31.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
34.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
           Re: Morning Consolidation
33.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
          Re: Morning Consolidation
24.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
38.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
39.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
40.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
50.
Feb 14, 2009Feb 14 2009
22.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
18.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
21.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
32.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
35.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
36.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
37.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
44.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
48.
Feb 14, 2009Feb 14 2009
46.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
47.
Feb 13, 2009Feb 13 2009
49.
Feb 14, 2009Feb 14 2009
51.
Feb 16, 2009Feb 16 2009
52.
Feb 17, 2009Feb 17 2009