Ubisoft: EndWar PC Impacted by Piracy [Oct 08, 2008, 09:31 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
Videogaming247 quotes Ubisoft Shanghai creative director Michael de Plater
on how piracy is a reason Tom Clancy's EndWar is appearing on consoles
first, with plans for a PC edition remaining vague (story). He
says this of a PC version of the voice-controlled RTS game: "To be honest, if PC
wasn’t pirated to hell and back, there’d probably be a PC version coming out the
same day as the other two," also saying: "You know, the level of piracy that you
get with the PC just cannibalizes the others, because people just steal that
version." He goes on to agree with dire predictions about the impact of piracy
on PC gaming: "But at the moment, if you release the PC version, essentially
what you’re doing is letting people have a free version that they rip off
instead of a purchased version. Piracy’s basically killing PC."
This is a very important comment that breaks down where I believe the problem lies. I don't think there will always be people who buy games. When game quality goes to a level that is undesirable there will not be people buying software. But there will be people stealing it. It's not a guarantee that when you put a game on the market that people will buy it. Ever.
No product ever gets that guarantee. Regardless if people want to steal it or not, the product must be worth it's asking price for people to spend money on it.
And an overpriced product might as well be a worthless product.
The concept I hear developers trying to hide behind is that if piracy did not exist, then people would be buying the game. The value of the product is not boosted by the absence of theft.
The games need to be better. Plain and simple. It doesn't matter what you do to thwart piracy, it doesn't make your games worth the asking price.
Companies like selling games on consoles because the game doesn't have to be very good to sell. They also love the idea that they can port it to the PC and make a few more bucks but they don't seem to get that this audience can see the real value of the game and won't pay the crazy prices they want. (in most cases, i'm guessing fallout 3 will sell fine)
uhm, I think you clearly took my comment out of context.
It boils down to the simple fact that if someone WANTS a game, they're either going to BUY it or STEAL it. There is no ambiguity there; and the game being good, bad or ugly is IRRELEVANT.
Truth. What many people fail to understand is that if something can be obtained for free, it will be taken. It doesn't matter how good it is or how much it is worth. Free = taken. If somebody downloads a game, it's not because they absolutely have to play it. They download it because they can. If piracy were to disappear, these people would not suddenly rush to the stores and buy everything they could get their hands on.
Yep
This comment was edited on Oct 9, 2008, 15:54.
Game developers are just human beings who happen to make games for a living. If you want to hold us up to higher standards of conduct, then go ahead
...but don't be surprised if we don't uphold them
...but don't be surprised if we don't uphold them
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 16 July 2025, 04:00.