GTA 4 PC Specs

The Games for Windows Website now offers recommended system requirements for the upcoming PC edition of Grand Theft Auto IV, which seem pretty modest considering the promise of higher-resolution graphics. The specs call for Windows XP SP2, a dual core CPU (Intel Pentium D or better), 2 GB of RAM, 18GB of free hard disk space, a dual-layer DVD drive, and a 512MB Direct3D 10 compatible video card or Direct3D 9 card compatible "with Shader." Thanks Videogaming247.
View : : :
88.
 
Re: ...
Sep 15, 2008, 00:12
88.
Re: ... Sep 15, 2008, 00:12
Sep 15, 2008, 00:12
 
I played Vice City on the PC quite awhile after it was released and loved it, sure the graphics were dated at the time.

Several weeks ago I got San Andreas for twenty bucks through Steam and after adding a few graphic enhancing mods, I think it's an excellent game. Not that the eye candy matters, it's a well designed and fun game in my opinion.

I wish someone would make a full-blown RPG like these games.

I've had bad experiences for the most part like anyone else with console to PC ports and generally avoid them 99% of the time, but Rockstar seems to put in a massive effort.

I could complain and nitpick about a few controller issues with the port, such as flying with a mouse (don't do it, reconfigure your keyboard) but all in all, they've done about the best job you really can in allowing you to remap controller keys to the mouse and keyboard.

I'm quite willing to buy GTA4 and look forward to it. As I don't know anyone with a console except for my buddy that has a PS2 and San Andreas (which I've never seen in action) I don't really care how late it is.

I'd rather have a fun game that does justice to the PC controls than worry about some PCHP guy that played it SEVEN months ago on a console that I have no interest in.

Thanks Rockstar, for your attention to detail.

Avatar 19418
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
2.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
3.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
4.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
5.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
6.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
7.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
8.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
13.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
14.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
16.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
17.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
     Re: No subject
18.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
     Re: No subject
19.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
      Re: No subject
20.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
      Re: No subject
21.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
       Re: No subject
22.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
        Re: No subject
24.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
         Re: No subject
31.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
      Re: No subject
10.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
15.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
27.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
28.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
30.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
9.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
11.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
12.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
25.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
   Re: Damn
23.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
26.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
29.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
32.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
33.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
34.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
35.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
85.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
36.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
37.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
38.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
39.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
     Re: No subject
41.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
      Re: No subject
42.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
       Re: No subject
43.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
       Re: No subject
44.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
        Re: No subject
46.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
         Re: No subject
45.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
       Re: No subject
47.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
        Re: No subject
48.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
         Re: No subject
49.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
          Re: No subject
50.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
        Re: No subject
51.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
         Re: No subject
52.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
         Re: No subject
40.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
     Re: No subject
53.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
54.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
58.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
59.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
   Re: ...
60.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
    Re: ...
63.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
     Re: ...
64.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
      Re: ...
65.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
       Re: ...
66.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
        Re: ...
68.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
        Re: ...
71.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
         Re: ...
55.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
56.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
57.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
61.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
62.
Sep 13, 2008Sep 13 2008
67.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
70.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
73.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
74.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
   Re: ...
75.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
    Re: ...
76.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
    Re: ...
77.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
     Re: DRM
79.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
      Re: DRM
80.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
       Re: DRM
81.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
        Re: DRM
82.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
         Re: DRM
83.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
          Re: DRM
84.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
           Re: DRM
86.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
    Re: ...
87.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
     Re: ...
 88.
Sep 15, 2008Sep 15 2008
      Re: ...
89.
Sep 17, 2008Sep 17 2008
       Re: ...
90.
Sep 17, 2008Sep 17 2008
   Re: ...
72.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
69.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008
78.
Sep 14, 2008Sep 14 2008