Far Cry 2: Lose A Buddy, Lose Content

Videogaming247 reports an interesting tidbit about Far Cry 2 they picked up at the Games convention. Apparently when one of the game's NPC "buddy" characters meets an untimely demise, the game content associated with that character dies as well. They quote Patrick Redding, the narrative head on the shooter follow-up: "That’s the price you pay for having buddies. When I unlock a buddy like that and then use him, either by getting involved in one of his missions… or by allowing him to come and rescue me, there’s always a risk that he could be killed. If he’s killed, he’s gone forever and the content associated with that character is no long available to me. So for example, any side quests that he’d be able to give me are no longer available."
View : : :
69.
 
Re: RE: Great Idea
Sep 10, 2008, 12:10
69.
Re: RE: Great Idea Sep 10, 2008, 12:10
Sep 10, 2008, 12:10
 
No one likes a person who complains about a free meal.

Again, what does that have to do with the quality of games?

If game production budgets weren't 20 million dollars then perhaps they would be more willing to take a risk.

Maybe if they focused on gameplay more than graphics, their budgets wouldn't be so high? I know, it's a shocking idea. Remember Sins of a Solar Empire? It sold 500,000 copies. By AAA budget standards, that's an utter failure. Except Sins only cost $1 million to make. It's called smart business. Don't always try to make a game that appeals to everyone. Focus on a target audience and fill a niche that the big publishers won't touch. You expect me to pity all these developers and publishers because they want every game to sell 10 million units?

Half of the projects at PAX for the PC were MMO games, how do you design meaningful choices in that genre?

MMOs are derivative crap. I really wish they would all just disappear. Again, why make an MMORPG when you can make a much better single-player RPG? Oh, right, greed. Everybody looks at WoW and says "Hey! We want that kind of cashcow!"

Now, don't you think you've trolled FC2 enough?

How exactly am I "trolling" FC2? Is it because I don't think that killable NPCs is a big deal? I've stated in numerous threads that I think FC2 has potential and I've never, ever said "This game is going to suck." Remember, just because people disagree with you doesn't make them a troll.

Avatar 20715
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
21.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
22.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
24.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
25.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
26.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
27.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
28.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
29.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
32.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
33.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
34.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
2.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
16.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
37.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
3.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
4.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
5.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
7.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
12.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
42.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
43.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
46.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
45.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
47.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
49.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
51.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
52.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
54.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
55.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
       Re: RE: Great Idea
56.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
        Re: RE: Great Idea
57.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
         Re: RE: Great Idea
58.
Sep 8, 2008Sep 8 2008
          Re: RE: Great Idea
60.
Sep 8, 2008Sep 8 2008
           Re: RE: Great Idea
61.
Sep 8, 2008Sep 8 2008
            Re: RE: Great Idea
62.
Sep 9, 2008Sep 9 2008
            Re: RE: Great Idea
63.
Sep 9, 2008Sep 9 2008
             Re: RE: Great Idea
64.
Sep 9, 2008Sep 9 2008
              Re: RE: Great Idea
65.
Sep 9, 2008Sep 9 2008
               Re: RE: Great Idea
66.
Sep 9, 2008Sep 9 2008
                Re: RE: Great Idea
68.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                 Re: RE: Great Idea
 69.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                  Re: RE: Great Idea
70.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                   Re: RE: Great Idea
71.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                    Re: RE: Great Idea
72.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                     Re: RE: Great Idea
74.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                      Re: RE: Great Idea
80.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                      Re: RE: Great Idea
73.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                     Re: RE: Great Idea
78.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                      Re: RE: Great Idea
79.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                       Re: RE: Great Idea
81.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                        Re: RE: Great Idea
82.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                         Re: RE: Great Idea
75.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                     Re: RE: Great Idea
76.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                      Re: RE: Great Idea
77.
Sep 10, 2008Sep 10 2008
                      Re: RE: Great Idea
83.
Sep 11, 2008Sep 11 2008
                      Re: RE: Great Idea
67.
Sep 9, 2008Sep 9 2008
              Re: RE: Great Idea
59.
Sep 8, 2008Sep 8 2008
48.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
8.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
10.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
9.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
11.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
13.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
14.
Sep 5, 2008Sep 5 2008
15.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
17.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
18.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
20.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
19.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
23.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
30.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
31.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
35.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
36.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
38.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
39.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
40.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
41.
Sep 6, 2008Sep 6 2008
44.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
53.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008
50.
Sep 7, 2008Sep 7 2008