How can you claim to support this move when it clearly doesn't match your "as long as" criteria? Sending out 25,000 "pay us or we'll sue you" notices isn't putting the burden of proof on anyone.
Which is why I put the cavet on what I said. I'm all for prosecuting pirates as long as software companies can prove that they are legitimate pirates, and they the companies can't squirm out of paying court costs if they are proven wrong.
Bear in mind that the legal system in the US is very different to that in the UK. In the US, companies can get away with blue-murder at the expense of the "little guy". If the legal system in the UK is more that that in Australia (which I think it is), there is little latitude for companies to get away with running over people making spurious claims and then not paying court costs. Don't believe everything you read in the media ... who just want to sell papers and online advertising.