Ubisoft Sues over Assassin's Creed Leak

GameSpot reports that Ubisoft is suing Optical Experts Manufacturing, alleging one of the employees of the Charlotte, North Carolina-based disc replication company pilfered a copy of Assassin's Creed and leaked it to the internet. The GameSpot story indicates the game sold only 40,000 copies in the US through June, but that over 700,000 pirated copies of the game were downloaded. They also relate an odd-sounding claim that Ubisoft intentionally included a bug in the code that would crash the game as a security measure, and that negative reviews of the buggy leaked version harmed their reputation. The suit is said to be for copyright infringement, breach of contract, and negligence, and Ubisoft is asking for over $20 million in damages and legal fees. Here's the strange bit about this supposedly intentional bug:
In addition to lost sales as a direct result of piracy, the publisher also claimed its reputation was hurt by the leak as well. Ubisoft says it included a bug in the pre-release Assassin's Creed for security reasons that would cause the game to crash partway through. The bug was supposedly removed from the retail edition, but a mix of negative reviews of the leaked and bug-equipped pirated version of the game and legitimate reviews of the retail edition created customer confusion and caused "irreparable harm" to its reputation, Ubisoft said.
View : : :
16.
 
No subject
Aug 7, 2008, 10:05
16.
No subject Aug 7, 2008, 10:05
Aug 7, 2008, 10:05
 
wtf dude the comments thing is fucked
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
2.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
3.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
8.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
13.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
4.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
5.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
6.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
10.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
12.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
17.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
21.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
   Re: So...
23.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
    Re: So...
25.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
     Re: So...
27.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
      Re: So...
28.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
       Re: So...
72.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
     Re: So...
73.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
74.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
45.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
    Re: So...
31.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
   Re: So...
34.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
    Re: So...
39.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
     Re: So...
43.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
      Re: So...
48.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
       Re: So...
77.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
       Re: So...
7.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
9.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
11.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
14.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
15.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
 16.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
No subject
18.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
19.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
20.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
22.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
24.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
26.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
30.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
29.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
32.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
35.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
38.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
49.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
68.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
   Re: 700k
69.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
    no subject
70.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
     Re: no subject
71.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
     Re: no subject
76.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
33.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
36.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
37.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
47.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
54.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
57.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
58.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
59.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
78.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
79.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
80.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
82.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
87.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
       Re: Sorry long reply
88.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
        Re: Sorry long reply
90.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
         Re: Sorry long reply
91.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
          Re: Sorry long reply
92.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
           Re: Sorry long reply
93.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
            Re: Sorry long reply
94.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
           Re: Sorry long reply
100.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
            Re: Sorry long reply
108.
Aug 9, 2008Aug 9 2008
             Re: Sorry long reply
110.
Aug 9, 2008Aug 9 2008
              Re: Sorry long reply
111.
Aug 12, 2008Aug 12 2008
               No subject
112.
Aug 12, 2008Aug 12 2008
                Re: No subject
81.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
85.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
86.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
89.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
95.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
96.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
      Re: Jerkk
98.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
       Re: Jerkk
99.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
        Re: Jerkk
101.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
         Re: Jerkk
102.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
          Re: Jerkk
104.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
          Re: Jerkk
105.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
           Re: Jerkk
106.
Aug 9, 2008Aug 9 2008
            Re: Jerkk
107.
Aug 9, 2008Aug 9 2008
             Re: Jerkk
109.
Aug 9, 2008Aug 9 2008
             Re: Jerkk
97.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008
83.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
84.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
40.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
41.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
42.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
44.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
46.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
50.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
51.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
52.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
55.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
56.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
75.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
53.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
60.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
61.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
62.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
63.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
65.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
64.
Aug 7, 2008Aug 7 2008
103.
Aug 8, 2008Aug 8 2008