Mass Effect Patch & DLC

This page offers a new version 1.01 patch for the PC edition of Mass Effect, and the Mass Effect Community Website announces the release the PC edition of the Burn Down the Sky downloadable content. There is a process for acquiring the DLC that involves generating a new CD key. The downloads are also available The Patches Scrolls.
View : : :
40.
 
Re: Wrong
Jul 30, 2008, 03:48
40.
Re: Wrong Jul 30, 2008, 03:48
Jul 30, 2008, 03:48
 
Agent_X7

trust me I read the entire thread - HE was making a broad generalization, YOU attacked him directly. He had a point, and again you totally avoid saying anything intelligent about the subject and instead attacked someone. well done

I also understood what you quoted. Problem is, you took it out of context and I don't have to be held to that. so here is his point, for a 3rd time -

EA TREATS YOU LIKE A PIRATE IF YOU BUY THE GAME BUT NOT IF YOU PIRATE IT. SO WHY PAY TO BE TREATED LIKE A PIRATE?

And that's a valid argument. The people who download the game illegally don't have to put up with product activation or Safedisc or starforce or anything like that. The people who buy the game are the ones who get treated like pirates, who have to deal with DRM issues that prevent a game from working.

That's the flaw in his logic of course. He claims to download to make sure the game runs on his system, (maybe he just means system requirements but...) of course if the problems are DRM related, they won't be present in the downloaded version. Mass Effect's activation cause any problem now, especially since the disc isn't needed after install, but with activation the problem comes from A) busy activation servers ala Bioshock's launch, B) installing the game a 3rd or 4th time 2 years from now. But civilized people can discuss these things without calling each other 'stupid' or 'dipshit' - I simply called you on it after already demonstrating your total inability to actually discuss the issue or even bring up a single intelligent point.

This comment was edited on Jul 30, 03:49.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
2.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
3.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
4.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
5.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
6.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
7.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
8.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
9.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
10.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
12.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
14.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
11.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
13.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
22.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
23.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
15.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
16.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
18.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
19.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
17.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
20.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
21.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
25.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
26.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
30.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
31.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
   Re: Wrong
37.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
   Re: Wrong
 40.
Jul 30, 2008Jul 30 2008
    Re: Wrong
44.
Jul 30, 2008Jul 30 2008
     Re: Wrong
45.
Aug 1, 2008Aug 1 2008
      Re: Wrong
29.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
39.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
46.
Aug 1, 2008Aug 1 2008
24.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
27.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
28.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
33.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
34.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
  ....
32.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
35.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
36.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
47.
Aug 4, 2008Aug 4 2008
38.
Jul 29, 2008Jul 29 2008
41.
Jul 30, 2008Jul 30 2008
42.
Jul 30, 2008Jul 30 2008
43.
Jul 30, 2008Jul 30 2008