Activision Blizzard Cuts Coming

Activision Blizzard to suffer job cuts on mcvuk.com has word that the merger of Activision and Blizzard will lead to an "all-star team" of developers, but that "overlaps" will result in "redundancies," meaning that some people are going to lose their jobs: Here are quotes pulled from their Thomas Tippl interview:
“With every merger, there is overlap and redundancy, and so the same will be true here. Of course we’re going to go to our customers with one face. We don’t need two sales forces,” he explained.

“Having said that, if you look at our industry, it’s rapidly growing – last year it grew 30 per cent. So over time I expect our headcount to grow.”

“But in the short term we will exterminate some of our overlap through redundancy – but we will treat people respectfully.”

“We will try to put the best team together – the all-star team. We’ll update both companies’ skill and experience levels and become a formidable company,” he added.
View : : :
11.
 
No subject
Jul 17, 2008, 12:22
11.
No subject Jul 17, 2008, 12:22
Jul 17, 2008, 12:22
 
BOB SLYDELL
Here's a peculiar one. Milton Waddams.

DOM
Who's he?

BOB
You know, squirrely looking guy, mumbles a lot.

DOM
Oh.

BOB SLYDELL
We can't find a record of him being a current employee here.

BOB PORTER
I looked into it more deeply and I found what happened was he got layed off about five years ago and no one ever told him about it. But through a glitch in Payroll, he still gets a paycheck. I went ahead and fixed the glitch.

BILL
Great.

DOM
So, um, Milton has been let go.

BOB SLYDELL
Just a second there, Professor. We, uh, we fixed the glitch. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore. So it'll just work itself out naturally.


Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
2.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
3.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
5.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
6.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
7.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
16.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
17.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
     *sniff* *sniff*
10.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
4.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
8.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
9.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
 11.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
No subject
12.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
13.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
14.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
15.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
18.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
19.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
20.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
21.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
22.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
23.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
24.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
25.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
26.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
   Re: dot
27.
Jul 17, 2008Jul 17 2008
28.
Jul 18, 2008Jul 18 2008
29.
Jul 18, 2008Jul 18 2008