6.
 
Re: Wow is right.
Jun 27, 2008, 07:26
F7
6.
Re: Wow is right. Jun 27, 2008, 07:26
Jun 27, 2008, 07:26
F7
 
Calling the article dumb is in itself 'dumb'. The author eloquently argues his point, one that is irrefutable historically speaking, and the only counter-argument you dolts can come up with is that, 'It's dumb.' Kudos to you guys! I'm sure corporate entities are knocking down your doors to employ you geniuses!

If any of you had the slightest clue about colonization, it's place in history, and it's ripple effects (racism in America, land grabs in Zimbabwe which has lead to the current issues over there, etc.) that are felt in contemporary times, you'd react differently. But by and large I think that the reason you reacted the way you did is simply because you do not have the knowledge to understand the authors' article on a fundamental basis. And if you cannot understand the basic concepts of an argument, nothing that's said will make sense to you.

Shut down the PC and open a book.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 26, 2008Jun 26 2008
2.
Jun 26, 2008Jun 26 2008
3.
Jun 27, 2008Jun 27 2008
4.
Jun 27, 2008Jun 27 2008
5.
Jun 27, 2008Jun 27 2008
 6.
Jun 27, 2008Jun 27 2008
   Re: Wow is right.
7.
Jun 27, 2008Jun 27 2008
8.
Jun 27, 2008Jun 27 2008
9.
Jun 27, 2008Jun 27 2008