Godfather Game Lawsuit

Mario Puzo may be sleeping with Luca Brasi and the fishes since 1999, but his estate is not letting anyone horn in on his territory, as this report indicates that Anthony Puzo has filed a lawsuit against Paramount Pictures over revenue from the recent Godfather video game. The author's son claims the estate is due at least $1 million from the game, based on an agreement between his father and the movie studio in 1992 that was "to give Puzo a significant share of the revenue of any audio-visual products sold or rented with elements of the 'Godfather' movies." Paramount has not yet commented on the lawsuit, though in an interesting related note, EA has made it clear a sequel to the game is in the works.
View : : :
41.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 19, 2008, 18:49
41.
Re: No subject Jun 19, 2008, 18:49
Jun 19, 2008, 18:49
 
Adding to the obvious fact you don't have a clue...Mario Puzo himself signed the deal with Paramount, not Anthony.

Good point, I had forgotten about that. Regardless, it only reinforces the fact that the current notion of IP "protection" is a farce. Puzo sold the franchise to Paramount so he could make more money, not so he could protect the integrity of the franchise. Two inferior sequels and a crappy game later just goes to show how well the the frachise has been "protected." In the end, I guess it's all about the money as the Godfather franchise is being passed around like a whore.

The government would be protecting those very corporations that own the IP's to begin with.

That's only if a corporation owns the IP. If the IP is buried with its original creator, the government would protect it from everyone.

Not to mention with your method, tax-payers would be footing the bill for defense lawyers instead of Paramount.

That's one potential downside, yes, unless the government didn't hold trials for copyright infringement and simply fined/killed anyone who committed it. One can always dream.

If this Estate was controlled by "joe-blow & sons holdings co." and they filed the suit on behalf of the Puzo estate, would you feel any better about it?

As I mentioned earlier, if Anthony Puzo doesn't see any of the money he wins from the lawsuit and if that money goes to charity or something then hey, that's great. In the more likely event that the money goes to Anthony, then this is all about greed, as I've repeatedly stated throughout this debate. Simply put, people shouldn't get money for things they haven't contributed to.

It really comes down to this: Did Anthony Puzo create the Godfather? No. Did he write the books? No. Did he make the movies? No. Did he make the game? No. Does he have a legal contract with Paramount that gives him royalties on these things? Yes. Given his total lack of involvement with the creation of these things, does he actually deserve any royalties from them? No.

Avatar 20715
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
3.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
28.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
30.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
31.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
32.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
33.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
     Re: No subject
34.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
     Re: No subject
35.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
      Re: No subject
36.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
       Re: No subject
37.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
        Re: No subject
38.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
         Re: No subject
39.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
          Re: No subject
40.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
           Re: No subject
 41.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
            Re: No subject
42.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
             Re: No subject
43.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
              Re: No subject
44.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
               Re: No subject
46.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
                Re: No subject
47.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
                 Re: No subject
48.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
                  Re: No subject
49.
Jun 20, 2008Jun 20 2008
                   Re: No subject
51.
Jun 20, 2008Jun 20 2008
                    Re: No subject
52.
Jun 20, 2008Jun 20 2008
                     Re: No subject
53.
Jun 20, 2008Jun 20 2008
                      Re: No subject
54.
Jun 21, 2008Jun 21 2008
               Re: No subject
2.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
4.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
5.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
6.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
7.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
9.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
10.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
     Re: No subject
12.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
      Re: No subject
29.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
8.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
18.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
19.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
     Re: No subject
20.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
      Re: No subject
11.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
13.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
16.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
14.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
15.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
17.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
21.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
22.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
24.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
27.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
23.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
25.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
26.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
45.
Jun 19, 2008Jun 19 2008
50.
Jun 20, 2008Jun 20 2008
55.
Jun 24, 2008Jun 24 2008