Call of Duty 5 Details - Co-op Support

Computer and Video Games has details from OXM on the next Call of Duty game, which will not be called Call of Duty 5, but rather Call of Duty: World at War, a return to the World War II setting in the works at Treyarch Studios. Word is the game will center around the Pacific theatre, though Russia's advance on Berlin will also be depicted. There's also word that the military shooter sequel's use of the engine from CoD4 creates a grittier and scarier environment than previous CoD games, and a further blurb on Videogaming247 mentions target platforms as PC, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and Wii (the version for the latter platform is being developed separately), and the hopeful news from both articles is the game will include cooperative multiplayer support. No release date is projected at this point. Thanks Voodoo Extreme.
View : : :
10.
 
Re: ...
Jun 9, 2008, 10:45
10.
Re: ... Jun 9, 2008, 10:45
Jun 9, 2008, 10:45
 
NEway, I'm not convinced returning to WWII is a great idea. There have been so many conflicts in history it seems a real copout to go for the most obvious and overused one. I mean for fuck's sake there's a war in Iraq at the moment and conflicts in Sudan yet they're left alone because it's politically safer to dig up a 60yr old war. Pathetic.

I agree. Once again, this is going to be less than stellar and yet another CoD series Black mark for Treyarch.

I agree with you, Iraq would have been very cool; but my guess is that (a) they're afraid of the politics associated with it (b) they don't like working with a Brownish palette

Vietnam would have been *awesome*.

WWII has been done to death and I for one can't possibly imagine why they'd want to do that again. Hey, at the end of the day, the gamers will speak. Gamers flop this one and (a) they won't do it again (b) it will probably be Game Over for Treyarch


This comment was edited on Jun 9, 10:45.
Game developers are just human beings who happen to make games for a living. If you want to hold us up to higher standards of conduct, then go ahead
...but don't be surprised if we don't uphold them
Avatar 9141
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
2.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
3.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
32.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
41.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
4.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
5.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
6.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
17.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
18.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
20.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
50.
Jun 10, 2008Jun 10 2008
28.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
34.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
40.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
42.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
43.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
44.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
45.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
47.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
49.
Jun 10, 2008Jun 10 2008
51.
Jun 10, 2008Jun 10 2008
7.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
9.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
 10.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
  Re: ...
11.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
12.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
8.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
13.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
21.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
22.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
24.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
14.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
15.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
36.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
16.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
19.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
23.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
25.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
26.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
27.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
29.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
35.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
38.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
     Re: No subject
39.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
      Re: No subject
52.
Jun 10, 2008Jun 10 2008
       Re: No subject
33.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
53.
Jun 10, 2008Jun 10 2008
54.
Jun 10, 2008Jun 10 2008
     Re: No subject
30.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
31.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
37.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
46.
Jun 9, 2008Jun 9 2008
48.
Jun 10, 2008Jun 10 2008