Creative: Asus EAX Support Lacking

Creative Labs sends along a statement refuting claims by Asus that their latest audio cards offer EAX 5 support:
With respect for you and your readers, we wish to share this important information. With its recent driver updates, Asus is misleading its customers by suggesting that its sound cards now support EAX 5. Asus sound cards do not support EAX 5, nor do they support EAX 3 or EAX 4. There are a small number of PC game titles that specifically query the audio device on the system to see if EAX 5 is available before they will attempt to render more than 64 3D simultaneous audio voices. The new Asus drivers are falsely reporting EAX 5 capabilities in order to get these games to ouptut 3D audio on Asus sound cards. Asus customers are not getting a genuine EAX Advanced HD experience with this driver update. Furthermore, the several hundred games that support EAX 3 or EAX 4 for delivering in-game effects will not provide those effects from Asus sound cards.
View : : :
48.
 
No subject
Mar 25, 2008, 18:09
Dev
48.
No subject Mar 25, 2008, 18:09
Mar 25, 2008, 18:09
Dev
 
PHJF:
No, digital does not equal optical.
You could have said TOSLINK, or you could have said Optical.

For instance, digital video means DVI, or HDMI. No optical there, but its still digital. I'm not aware of an common optical format for video. Similarly, the HDMI 1.3 spec includes a DIGITAL audio option in the HDMI cable, again, its NOT optical.
It shouldn't matter in a sound system wheather you are using optical digital, or wired digital. Digital is digital. Theoretically, ideally, there should be no differance between them.
I personally use optical, just in case there might exist a differance, and because I've never had an optical system before now.
I'm fairly certain there are far more digital wired audio systems in existance than digital optical systems. So I don't have a problem beliving that most people, when they say digital, do not nessasarily mean optical digital.

I even wrote my reply in such a way that if you HAD meant optical (rather than the digital you said), I covered that as well, and agreed with you on the point of optical sound.

Also, I wrote my reply so that if you had meant DD LIVE, I covered that as well.

Note that I agree with you that creative sux, I'm just disagreeing with your semantics I'm that kinda person

This comment was edited on Mar 25, 18:10.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
2.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
3.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
5.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
6.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
11.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
42.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
8.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
9.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
12.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
4.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
7.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
10.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
15.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
22.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
32.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
    Re: .vista
13.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
14.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
25.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
16.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
17.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
18.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
19.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
20.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
21.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
23.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
35.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
24.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
26.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
28.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
29.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
30.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
34.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
27.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
31.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
33.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
36.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
45.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
46.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
37.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
39.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
40.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
44.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
47.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
49.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
     Re: No subject
50.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
      Re: No subject
53.
Mar 27, 2008Mar 27 2008
     Re: No subject
38.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
41.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
43.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
 48.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
No subject
51.
Mar 26, 2008Mar 26 2008
52.
Mar 27, 2008Mar 27 2008