Creative: Asus EAX Support Lacking

Creative Labs sends along a statement refuting claims by Asus that their latest audio cards offer EAX 5 support:
With respect for you and your readers, we wish to share this important information. With its recent driver updates, Asus is misleading its customers by suggesting that its sound cards now support EAX 5. Asus sound cards do not support EAX 5, nor do they support EAX 3 or EAX 4. There are a small number of PC game titles that specifically query the audio device on the system to see if EAX 5 is available before they will attempt to render more than 64 3D simultaneous audio voices. The new Asus drivers are falsely reporting EAX 5 capabilities in order to get these games to ouptut 3D audio on Asus sound cards. Asus customers are not getting a genuine EAX Advanced HD experience with this driver update. Furthermore, the several hundred games that support EAX 3 or EAX 4 for delivering in-game effects will not provide those effects from Asus sound cards.
View : : :
36.
 
No subject
Mar 25, 2008, 15:04
Dev
36.
No subject Mar 25, 2008, 15:04
Mar 25, 2008, 15:04
Dev
 
TQ: Did you read my post?
I mentioned auzentech's product in it.

I also mentioned several ways creative stifled innovation

Here's a little more detail on part of it

a) most people use motherboard sound. I dont recall the exact stats, but its something like 90% or more of people use motherboard sound.
Wait, I just remembered something, here's the stats on the average gamer:
http://www.steampowered.com/status/survey.html
Its not 90%, but those stats are for gamers, not average person, and it doesn't show what the mix of "other" is.

b) Given that, what kind of people buy a separate sound card? Well music people are one, and yeah, there has been some innovation in terms of music sound cards. Whats the other biggest category? Gamers. Just to make it clear, I'm talking about gamers and gaming cards in how they've stifled it. I'm not a pro musician, and I'm sure there's been advances in that area, especially since you aren't "locked" (see futher down) into choosing a creative card to get advanced EAX if you are a musician.

c) what do gamers want? Good gaming sound, which generally means EAX. What cards offer advanced EAX (I'm talking EAX 3,4,5, etc) sound? NONE except creative (see previous comment and the blues story above). See those stats I linked above, as far as I can tell the biggest categories of add on cards that gamers use are creative. EAX is a closed spec. So it almost doesn't matter what non creative cards do, the majority of gamers are going for creative and EAX. So yeah, thats kinda stifled things.

d) the main exception are gamers who want something quick/cheap and go for a $20 or so off name brand, and even then there are creative options, past generations yeah, but they are there.

e) auzentech with their prelude is just about the only exception that has full eax sound, because they use the x-fi chip. And its a recent exception, up until about a year ago, there were no exceptions.

TQ:
Also, I mentioned OpenAL in my post, again did you read it? That's what Alchemy is based on. And if you are lucky, your game is on the list of supported ones. You think most old games are there on the supported list? Hah
BTW, here's a direct link to supported titles:
http://connect.creativelabs.com/alchemy/Lists/Games/AllItems.aspx
They don't even have HALF LIFE on the list!! I go back and replay that game occasionally and it offered surround sound. Plus, what about Counter Strike, which is only the worlds most popular online FPS game (it STILL is btw, despite all the newer games)? Nope sorry, can't do surround sound in vista in those games, only stereo. If you have someone coming up behind you, tough.
Edit: After a further check of the list, they do list some steam games under STEAM (instead of individual titles). However the info they list is marked as unverified, so they haven't bothered to check to see if the most popular online FPS game in the world works with surround in vista.


Here's another stifling thing, they've had the ability to EASILY add existing innovations to existing products, but instead wait year(s) until they release their next gen cards. They wouldn't even have to release the innovations for free, they could charge a fee to add something like dolby digital live sound and people like me would be glad to pay for it if it was reasonably priced, since they could offer it as a download it would have very little overhead costs, they've already paid the R&D costs since they add the things into future generations, all the need to pay are the driver teams, and they are probably just saleried employees already. So it even makes good business sense to do something like this.



And finally, what exactly has creative offered since the days of the Live! (which BTW, one of the big advantages was supposed to be a powerful SOFTWARE programmable chip, thats what creative was hyping about in those days. And they never took advantage of it, even though they've used similar chips since then in all thier cards. Heck they could have opened up the specs of the chip itself and let other people do all the work for free of adding features and improving things. This would have actually INCREASED the demand for creative hardware, which is basically all they are selling since thier software/driver support is such suck. Example, look at all the sales of linksys wrt54g router when they released all the firmware as open source in a buildable format. ) ?

Hmm, better quality inputs/ouputs. YEAH THATS A INNOVATION! Not. Its a logical evolutionary progression.
Hmm, higher khz for recoding and playback. YEAH THATS AN INNOVATION! Not. Again, its a logical evolutionary progression.
Hmm, higher bit rate in recording and playback. YEAH THATS AN INNOVATION! Not. Again, a logical evolutionary progression.
Hmm, EAX 5! YEAH THATS AN INNOVATION! Not really, its the closest thing X-Fi has to one, but its still not exactly an innovation. I haven't noticed any huge leap in gaming sound quality compared to EAX 4.

And... thats about it!

This comment was edited on Mar 25, 15:49.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
2.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
3.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
5.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
6.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
11.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
42.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
8.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
9.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
12.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
4.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
7.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
10.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
15.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
22.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
32.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
    Re: .vista
13.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
14.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
25.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
16.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
17.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
18.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
19.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
20.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
21.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
23.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
35.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
24.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
26.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
28.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
29.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
30.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
34.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
27.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
31.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
33.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
 36.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
No subject
45.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
46.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
37.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
39.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
40.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
44.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
47.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
49.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
     Re: No subject
50.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
      Re: No subject
53.
Mar 27, 2008Mar 27 2008
     Re: No subject
38.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
41.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
43.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
48.
Mar 25, 2008Mar 25 2008
51.
Mar 26, 2008Mar 26 2008
52.
Mar 27, 2008Mar 27 2008