Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Sweeney: PCs Good for Anything... But Games

Unreal creator: Tim Sweeney PCs are good for anything, just not games” on TG Daily is a Q&A with the Epic CEO which, as the title of the article suggests, features some negative comments about the PC as a gaming platform. This is actually just the age-old complaint about PCs with integrated graphics, as he says that mainstream PCs are not suited to gaming:

Retail stores like Best Buy are selling PC games and PCs with integrated graphics at the same time and they are not talking about the difference [to more capable gaming PCs]. Those machines are good for e-mail, web browsing, watching video. But as far as games go, those machines are just not adequate. It is no surprise that retail PC sales suffer from that. Online is different, because people who go and buy games online already have PCs that can play games. The biggest problem in this space right now is that you cannot go and design a game for a high end PC and downscale it to mainstream PCs. The performance difference between high-end and low-end PC is something like 100x.

58. Re: Read the article Mar 12, 2008, 21:19 MattyC
But somehow it's now Intel's fault? What benefit is it to Intel if they make an onboard integrated graphics controller that the equivalent of, say, a Geforce 7900? Great, their motherboards now cost a hundred bucks extra. Which gets them how many extra customers?

Intel joined the PC Gaming Alliance, what does fault have to do with it? They just want to pretend to get involved, that is fine with me, but either way I have no idea what you are trying to say with that. Obviously they think at least pretending to be involved benefits them, or they wouldn't have done so.

Stating that weak graphic solutions exist in a large number of systems owned by those unlikely to upgrade isn't saying "GO BUY A 360 AND GEARS2 K?". It is just the way it is. A lot of people with PCs don't want to game. Some game, but are happy with or whatever, but it can only help sales to increase the number of systems capable of running games. Like it or not, game companies are businesses, so they want to see the potential market increase.

Also an integrated graphics solution doesn't have to be included on every board, nor does it need to be on par with a 7900. He was talking about things more like old school software rendering in HL and Unreal, though that was wretched imo and I don't think if they create similar solutions it will end up being worth the effort. I think they should do it right or not at all.

Or let's say that Intel decides to offer high end integrated video in addition to keeping the low end. How many gamers are going to buy integrated video, even if it's supposedly on par with Nvidia/ATI's latest offerings? Would you?

We are talking better here... not high end. I don't think anyone was suggesting near top of the line video on a mobo. What WAS being discussed was providing higher quality so that Joe Consumer's Best Buy PC might run a few more games than it can now, not be the official computer of the CPL or whatever...

As I mentioned, Intel joined the silly thing not me, I don't understand why you insist on telling me what they want. I would imagine they know better than either of us. The newer laptop video chipset they put out is a modest improvement so I think they are putting at least some effort into this, though I can't say for sure if we will see more of that or not.

Attempting to improve the PC gaming market is fine with me. Just because something can be made better doesn't mean that every developer is running up a console flag and ditching the platform and calling it dead, as much as the whining around the community would imply at any rate.

This comment was edited on Mar 12, 21:34.
Avatar 39012
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Mar 10, 20:18 No subject PHJF
  2. Mar 10, 20:23 This is how a dinosaur goes extinct House
  3. Mar 10, 20:36 No subject Hump
  7. Mar 10, 20:48  Hump Has It Right eDave
  8. Mar 10, 20:56  Re: No subject Old_Geezer
  4. Mar 10, 20:37 No subject Donkey_Punch
  5. Mar 10, 20:42  Re: No subject Coolone
  6. Mar 10, 20:43  Re: No subject elefunk
  26. Mar 11, 04:04   Re: No subject  cliffski 
  33. Mar 11, 07:01   Re: No subject 4D-Boxing
  34. Mar 11, 07:28    Re: No subject Doma
  35. Mar 11, 07:56    Re: No subject LightHawkJ
  67. Mar 16, 03:24    Re: No subject CreamyBlood
  9. Mar 10, 20:58 No subject Rainier
  10. Mar 10, 21:19  Re: No subject Reactor
  12. Mar 10, 21:27   Re: No subject Bone43
  11. Mar 10, 21:24  Re: No subject Bone43
  13. Mar 10, 21:30  Re: No subject Ventura
  16. Mar 10, 22:28  Re: No subject Veinman
  17. Mar 10, 22:39   Re: No subject fangster
  18. Mar 10, 23:00    Re: No subject Prez
  19. Mar 10, 23:10    Re: No subject PHJF
  20. Mar 10, 23:13     Re: No subject Prez
  22. Mar 10, 23:29    Re: No subject Jerykk
  23. Mar 11, 01:32     Re: No subject [THA] Hamst3r
  14. Mar 10, 21:34 No subject Beaner
  15. Mar 10, 22:07  Re: No subject MMORPGHoD
  21. Mar 10, 23:19 ... theyarecomingforyou
  57. Mar 12, 20:42  Re: ... Creston
  24. Mar 11, 02:15 No subject rocketpcguy
  25. Mar 11, 03:47  Re: No subject ViRGE
  27. Mar 11, 04:38 Intel's integrated graphics Luther
  28. Mar 11, 04:38 The game is changing UnderLord
  31. Mar 11, 06:44  No subject Ranger Fish
  29. Mar 11, 06:10 No subject JaguarUSF
  30. Mar 11, 06:44  Re: No subject Burrito of Peace
  32. Mar 11, 06:50  Re: No subject Luther
  36. Mar 11, 08:31 ok. mysticmage
  37. Mar 11, 08:35 No subject Fugazi
  44. Mar 11, 15:16  Re: No subject MattyC
  48. Mar 11, 19:23   Re: No subject Fugazi
  49. Mar 11, 20:44    Re: No subject MattyC
  55. Mar 12, 20:20   Re: No subject Creston
  38. Mar 11, 09:35 Read the article Ecthelion
  39. Mar 11, 09:45  Re: Read the article Prez
  40. Mar 11, 10:04   Re: Read the article Luther
  56. Mar 12, 20:26  Re: Read the article Creston
>> 58. Mar 12, 21:19   Re: Read the article MattyC
  59. Mar 13, 19:05    Re: Read the article Creston
  60. Mar 14, 06:35     Re: Read the article Ecthelion
  41. Mar 11, 10:23 No subject KilrathiAce
  42. Mar 11, 12:18  Re: No subject Fion
  43. Mar 11, 15:12 No subject Reckless
  45. Mar 11, 15:24 A smart game developer would... Cartman
  46. Mar 11, 16:22 We're not returning to software yet.... Luther
  47. Mar 11, 17:37 Traitor Kxmode
  50. Mar 12, 08:22 No subject Brainp0wa
  51. Mar 12, 08:39 No subject Fugazi
  52. Mar 12, 10:04  Re: No subject Ecthelion
  53. Mar 12, 14:36 No subject LightHawkJ
  54. Mar 12, 20:08 What the fuck Creston
  61. Mar 14, 13:33 No subject dryden555
  62. Mar 14, 19:55  Re: No subject Krovven
  63. Mar 15, 06:37   Re: No subject Prez
  64. Mar 15, 11:11    Re: No subject Krovven
  65. Mar 15, 20:44     Re: No subject Prez
  66. Mar 16, 03:04      Re: No subject CreamyBlood
  68. May 17, 15:38 taşımacılık şirketi kardelen133


Blue's News logo