Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

Sweeney: PCs Good for Anything... But Games

Unreal creator: Tim Sweeney PCs are good for anything, just not games” on TG Daily is a Q&A with the Epic CEO which, as the title of the article suggests, features some negative comments about the PC as a gaming platform. This is actually just the age-old complaint about PCs with integrated graphics, as he says that mainstream PCs are not suited to gaming:

Retail stores like Best Buy are selling PC games and PCs with integrated graphics at the same time and they are not talking about the difference [to more capable gaming PCs]. Those machines are good for e-mail, web browsing, watching video. But as far as games go, those machines are just not adequate. It is no surprise that retail PC sales suffer from that. Online is different, because people who go and buy games online already have PCs that can play games. The biggest problem in this space right now is that you cannot go and design a game for a high end PC and downscale it to mainstream PCs. The performance difference between high-end and low-end PC is something like 100x.

View
55. Re: No subject Mar 12, 2008, 20:20 Creston
 
This is in line with the PC alliance thing they joined, he is talking about the problems of the platform

It's not a problem Matty, it's just them whining about not selling enough units. And MAYBE that's, I dunno, because their PC ports of their latest two games have sucked?

Integrated video sucks and a pretty reasonable number of PCs are running them

And these people have traditionally never bought the kind of game that Epic puts on the market. So what does it matter? Intel has been promising to improve their integrated video since the days of Doom3, and it still can't run anything that's less than five years old. It's not going to change. Whether the "PC Gaming Alliance" bleats about it or not. This is the same kind of bullshit that Valve had oh so long ago, how they were going to form this alliance that was going to miraculously make your ping < 0.003 seconds. And all they did was yap and bleat and in the end nothing fucking changed.

Why would Intel care? Why add integrated video that can play modern games when it just raises the price of your motherboard by 50-100 dollars, and the people that buy motherboards with integrated video (ie, the low end machines) AREN'T GOING TO BE PLAYING THE LATEST 3D SHOOTERS ANYWAYS.

He is spot on about this being something that is holding PC gaming back

Funny, because their earlier games sold just fine. I guess it wasn't holding it back then? Integrated graphics sucked just as much when UT came out.
And all this holding back has the PC platform generation 1.7 billion dollars of sales. I wish my salary would be so held back.

"increasing the quality of integrated video to up the potential market for more serious games on the PC. "

The people that play serious games, have a serious graphics card. The end. Or do you really see Joe Schmoe who buys his PC from fucking Best Buy somehow really getting involved in Gears of War 2?

It's Epic. All they know how to do is whine and moan and fucking cry. If they spent all the time they've wasted on bitching about the state of PC Gaming into actually making a decent game, we'd all be playing UT2K9million right now, and not be sitting here telling Epic to just shut the fuck up.

Creston

 
Avatar 15604
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Mar 10, 20:18 No subject PHJF
  2. Mar 10, 20:23 This is how a dinosaur goes extinct House
  3. Mar 10, 20:36 No subject Hump
  7. Mar 10, 20:48  Hump Has It Right eDave
  8. Mar 10, 20:56  Re: No subject Old_Geezer
  4. Mar 10, 20:37 No subject Donkey_Punch
  5. Mar 10, 20:42  Re: No subject Coolone
  6. Mar 10, 20:43  Re: No subject elefunk
  26. Mar 11, 04:04   Re: No subject  cliffski 
  33. Mar 11, 07:01   Re: No subject 4D-Boxing
  34. Mar 11, 07:28    Re: No subject Doma
  35. Mar 11, 07:56    Re: No subject LightHawkJ
  67. Mar 16, 03:24    Re: No subject CreamyBlood
  9. Mar 10, 20:58 No subject Rainier
  10. Mar 10, 21:19  Re: No subject Reactor
  12. Mar 10, 21:27   Re: No subject Bone43
  11. Mar 10, 21:24  Re: No subject Bone43
  13. Mar 10, 21:30  Re: No subject Ventura
  16. Mar 10, 22:28  Re: No subject Veinman
  17. Mar 10, 22:39   Re: No subject fangster
  18. Mar 10, 23:00    Re: No subject Prez
  19. Mar 10, 23:10    Re: No subject PHJF
  20. Mar 10, 23:13     Re: No subject Prez
  22. Mar 10, 23:29    Re: No subject Jerykk
  23. Mar 11, 01:32     Re: No subject [THA] Hamst3r
  14. Mar 10, 21:34 No subject Beaner
  15. Mar 10, 22:07  Re: No subject MMORPGHoD
  21. Mar 10, 23:19 ... theyarecomingforyou
  57. Mar 12, 20:42  Re: ... Creston
  24. Mar 11, 02:15 No subject rocketpcguy
  25. Mar 11, 03:47  Re: No subject ViRGE
  27. Mar 11, 04:38 Intel's integrated graphics Luther
  28. Mar 11, 04:38 The game is changing UnderLord
  31. Mar 11, 06:44  No subject Ranger Fish
  29. Mar 11, 06:10 No subject JaguarUSF
  30. Mar 11, 06:44  Re: No subject Burrito of Peace
  32. Mar 11, 06:50  Re: No subject Luther
  36. Mar 11, 08:31 ok. mysticmage
  37. Mar 11, 08:35 No subject Fugazi
  44. Mar 11, 15:16  Re: No subject MattyC
  48. Mar 11, 19:23   Re: No subject Fugazi
  49. Mar 11, 20:44    Re: No subject MattyC
>> 55. Mar 12, 20:20   Re: No subject Creston
  38. Mar 11, 09:35 Read the article Ecthelion
  39. Mar 11, 09:45  Re: Read the article Prez
  40. Mar 11, 10:04   Re: Read the article Luther
  56. Mar 12, 20:26  Re: Read the article Creston
  58. Mar 12, 21:19   Re: Read the article MattyC
  59. Mar 13, 19:05    Re: Read the article Creston
  60. Mar 14, 06:35     Re: Read the article Ecthelion
  41. Mar 11, 10:23 No subject KilrathiAce
  42. Mar 11, 12:18  Re: No subject Fion
  43. Mar 11, 15:12 No subject Reckless
  45. Mar 11, 15:24 A smart game developer would... Cartman
  46. Mar 11, 16:22 We're not returning to software yet.... Luther
  47. Mar 11, 17:37 Traitor Kxmode
  50. Mar 12, 08:22 No subject Brainp0wa
  51. Mar 12, 08:39 No subject Fugazi
  52. Mar 12, 10:04  Re: No subject Ecthelion
  53. Mar 12, 14:36 No subject LightHawkJ
  54. Mar 12, 20:08 What the fuck Creston
  61. Mar 14, 13:33 No subject dryden555
  62. Mar 14, 19:55  Re: No subject Krovven
  63. Mar 15, 06:37   Re: No subject Prez
  64. Mar 15, 11:11    Re: No subject Krovven
  65. Mar 15, 20:44     Re: No subject Prez
  66. Mar 16, 03:04      Re: No subject CreamyBlood
  68. May 17, 15:38 ta&#351;&#305;mac&#305;l&#305;k &#351;irketi kardelen133


footer

Blue's News logo