PC Gaming Alliance Formed

Top technology companies form gaming alliance (thanks Mike Martinez) officially announces the formation of the gaming alliance first revealed last week (story) to help promote/revive the PC gaming scene. Here's word:
Some of the top technology companies, including Intel, Microsoft, Dell, and Advanced Micro Devices joined forces Tuesday to form the PC Gaming Alliance, which will try to promote the PC as a gaming platform.

The alliance will bring hardware makers, software companies, and game publishers under one roof to "accelerate innovation, improve the gaming experience for consumers and serve as a collective source of market information and expertise on PC gaming," the alliance said in a statement.

The companies will work together on challenges facing the PC gaming industry, including piracy and the establishment of hardware requirements for PC games, the alliance said. PCGA also hopes to accelerate growth of the PC gaming industry and standardize the development of gaming PCs and software by developing and promoting guidelines.

The alliance comes at a time when PC video game sales are falling. PC games sales in the U.S. were $910.7 million in 2007, down from $970 million in 2006, according to research from NPD Techworld. PC game sales in 2007 dwarfed in comparison to the sale of software for video game consoles like Sony's PlayStation and Nintendo's Wii, which were $6.6 billion.

Unit shipments of PC game software totaled 36.4 million in 2007, compared to video game software unit shipments of 153.9 million, according to NPD.

The U.S. gaming industry already has the Entertainment Software Association, which represents vendors that publish games for both computers and consoles. About 90 percent of the $7.4 billion revenue of PC and console gaming software in 2006 belonged to ESA members, giving the association a dominant presence.

Other PCGA members include Acer, Epic, Nvidia and Razer USA.

The announcement comes during the Game Developers Conference, which is being held in San Francisco. During the show PCGA member Intel launched a new gaming platform formerly code-named "Skulltrail." The Intel Dual Socket Extreme Desktop Platform includes two quad-core microprocessors, totaling eight-processing engines, and supports graphics cards from ATI or Nvidia.
View : : :
90.
 
Re: No subject
Feb 21, 2008, 21:34
90.
Re: No subject Feb 21, 2008, 21:34
Feb 21, 2008, 21:34
 
Way back when, I went from a sega genesis to a 386. For me it was because games for PCs were different, and the control scheme was, and still is, far superior.

The games were generally more mature and covered far more topics and settings. Since consoles have become so popular, that line is now blurred. Many "adult themed" games are now available on the console, and this is to be expected given that gamers are aging and there are a number of different platforms on the market now. I have to say I am really disappointed and worried about the trend to "consolize" and make poor ports to the PC that I've experienced over the past couple of years. It simply doesn't take advantage of all the platform has to offer and is a deliberate decision on the part of the publisher to maximize profits and minimize costs. Back in the 386 days, PC versions had more features, not less. Why has this changed?

There are still games that I love that are, for now at least, only on PC. Every non-arcade flight sim for example. Which brings me back to controls. I can plug in a variety of controls and gamepads into my PC. How am I supposed to connect a programmable stick, throttle, and rudder pedals into a console? So let's make a console that accepts keyboard, mouse, and other peripherals. Let's see, it now has all this, a hard-drive, system memory, CPU, and GPU. Sounds like a PC to me.... a non-upgradeable, proprietary machine that is good for only a few specific things.

The PC as a platform is amazingly flexible and versatile, which is why it will likely remain my platform of choice. Contrary to popular belief (if it is), it does not cost a lot of money to maintain a decent rig. It will if you want a Ferrari, but you know, I think a Corvette is damn fine.

I remember spending a number of hours trying to free up 600kb of memory by fiddling with config.sys and autoexec.bat before successfully running Aces over Europe. I remember rebuilding Windows95 every 2-3 months. I waited a year before u/g to XP. I haven't had to rebuild the o/s once, even through a couple of u/g's. I can't remember it ever being this easy to play games on the PC as a platform. I waited to hear what Vista is like before taking the plunge. Glad I did, and so much for swimming Is there buggy software? Yep, there was back then too, even on the consoles (game breaking crash near the end of Sega's Outlander for eg.), but that's not the fault of the platform, that's the fault of the people making the software for it. Maybe it's a lack of tighter standards. If so, hopefully this group will address that.

I also recall way back when overhearing conversations about people d/l cracked games from BBS'. That, sadly, has not changed either, and still remains a poor argument for abandoning the PC as a platform.

So ends my stream-of-conciousness ramblings.


Avatar 14820
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
2.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
3.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
6.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
16.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
17.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
     Our savior!
68.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
      Re: Our savior!
75.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
       Re: Our savior!
37.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
     Re: No subject
25.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
4.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
7.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
18.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
20.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
     Re: No subject
21.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
     Re: No subject
5.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
9.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
10.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
11.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
  hm
12.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
14.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
15.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
    No subject
22.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
26.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
30.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
     Re: No subject
36.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
      Re: No subject
39.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
       Re: No subject
40.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
        Re: No subject
41.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
         Re: No subject
62.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
          Re: No subject
69.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
           Re: No subject
44.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
         Re: No subject
42.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
      Re: No subject
48.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
       Re: No subject
49.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
        Re: No subject
55.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
         Re: No subject
56.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
          Re: No subject
57.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
           Re: No subject
59.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
           Re: No subject
60.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
            KEYBOARD & MOUSE FTW!!
58.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
          Re: No subject
8.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
13.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
19.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
63.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
23.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
24.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
29.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
65.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
67.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
28.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
31.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
32.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
34.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
33.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
35.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
38.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
43.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
50.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
51.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
53.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
61.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
66.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
45.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
46.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
54.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
64.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
84.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
47.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
52.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
70.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
71.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
72.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
76.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
96.
Feb 27, 2008Feb 27 2008
73.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
74.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
77.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
78.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
79.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
80.
Feb 20, 2008Feb 20 2008
81.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
93.
Feb 23, 2008Feb 23 2008
94.
Feb 25, 2008Feb 25 2008
     Re: No subject
95.
Feb 25, 2008Feb 25 2008
      Re: No subject
82.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
83.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
85.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
87.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
     Re: No subject
88.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
      Re: No subject
89.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
       Re: No subject
 90.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
        Re: No subject
86.
Feb 21, 2008Feb 21 2008
91.
Feb 22, 2008Feb 22 2008
92.
Feb 23, 2008Feb 23 2008