PC gaming needs to use the hardware that consumers have rather than designing for what they want them to buy.
Amen, but...
The best thing the gaming alliance can do for PC gaming is encourage developers to stick with a common denominator that will work for the most possible users.
that's not going to happen because the whole purpose of this "alliance" is to sell new hardware. Games are what has driven the PC industry to this point. The overwhelming majority of PC users wouldn't need a Geforce 8800 and four cores if it weren't for games like Crysis forcing users to buy them. The executives at all of these hardware companies finally got their bean counters to run the numbers and realized that without PC games, there's nothing to push consumers to buy the latest one-hundred pipeline video cards and twelve core processors. Video game consoles don't get updated but every four or five years, so they can't makeup that revenue with console sales especially when the costs of the components decrease with each passing month. These hardware companies can only demand premium prices for their latest and greatest offerings if consumers are willing to buy them. And, without PC games requiring them, the overwhelming majority of consumers won't waste their money on those high-end components.
This comment was edited on Feb 20, 20:57.