Sins of a Solar Empire Patch Plans

A Sins of a Solar Empire version 1.02 Changelog outlines what's planned for an upcoming patch for Ironclad's recently released 4X space game (thanks Voodoo Extreme). The post outlines a number of fixes and balance changes, and word is: "We hope to get this out this week. Ironclad has been working hard to make v1.02 available as soon as possible but we also have to finish testing. "
View : : :
33.
 
Re: So far so good
Feb 7, 2008, 18:40
33.
Re: So far so good Feb 7, 2008, 18:40
Feb 7, 2008, 18:40
 
Amazing, Surf. You created a post that sounded like it was written by a 13 year old with an impulse control problem while simultaneously referring to yourself as 'evolved'.

I'd ask if you see the flaw in your reasoning there, but given some of your other posts it is already quite clear that reason is not something you're comfortable with.

Back on Topic:

I'm glad they're lowering the Siege Frigate HP, and I'm really glad they've upped the Pirate timer, though I saw a post by one of the IronClad guys (Blair, I think) in which he was making the argument that the Pirates should be made a touch more powerful to compensate for the frequency reduction, which I agree with. I'm a bit of an economic turtle, so Pirates are a great way for me to get back at those annoying AIs that think they can demand money from me just because I don't have the biggest standing army.


This comment was edited on Feb 7, 18:42.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
3.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
15.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
16.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
17.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
19.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
     Re: No subject
20.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
     Re: No subject
51.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
      Re: No subject
52.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
       Re: No subject
53.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
        Re: No subject
59.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
        Re: No subject
60.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
         Re: No subject
61.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
        Re: No subject
2.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
10.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
11.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
12.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
13.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
14.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
     Re: No subject
21.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
4.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
5.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
6.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
7.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
8.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
9.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
18.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
22.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
23.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
29.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
25.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
26.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
30.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
31.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
32.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
 33.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
  Re: So far so good
39.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
34.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
37.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
40.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
24.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
27.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
28.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
35.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
36.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
41.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
38.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
42.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
43.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
45.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
46.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
47.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
48.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
50.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
     Re: No subject
58.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
      Re: No subject
55.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
56.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
     Re: No subject
57.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
      Re: No subject
64.
Feb 9, 2008Feb 9 2008
     Re: No subject
65.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
      Re: No subject
66.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
       Re: No subject
67.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
        Re: No subject
68.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
         Re: No subject
69.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
         Re: No subject
70.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
          Re: No subject
71.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
           Re: No subject
72.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
            Re: No subject
73.
Feb 10, 2008Feb 10 2008
             Re: No subject
44.
Feb 7, 2008Feb 7 2008
49.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
54.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
62.
Feb 8, 2008Feb 8 2008
63.
Feb 9, 2008Feb 9 2008
74.
May 17, 2008May 17 2008