Universal Combat Freeware

Universal Combat is now available as a freeware release, as promised a couple of weeks ago (story). Word from 3000AD is: "Once again, our freeware game is released with no advertising, no nag screens, no expiration date, nothing. Just the full (and patched) single player game as was commercially released in Feb 2004, but with fewer music tracks (the game FAQ shows how players can add their own MP3 tracks) and no multiplayer." The download is available on Atomic Gamer, AusGamers, ComputerGames.ro, FanGaming, FileFront, Gamer's Hell, and Strategy Informer.
View : : :
140.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 3, 2008, 11:15
Re: No subject Jan 3, 2008, 11:15
Jan 3, 2008, 11:15
 
But I wish someone who had the legal knowledge would weigh in and defend the attorney folk in this particular area.

The answer is easy.

First let's talk about adverse possession, or, if you will, the neighbor-shitting-on-your-lawn problem.
This, like most of our laws, comes from colonial britain. And it makes sense.
For one, it discourages wasted land. Someone has property. It's valuable property, but it's just sitting there, not being used. This is wasteful.
For another, someone can't just shit on your land. It has to be hostile, it has to be actual, it has to be open and it has to be notorious. This means that someone must be on your land, knowing it isn't your land, for the statutory period (usually along the lines of 14-20 years), without hiding that he is there, and without your permission.

How often do you think this actually happens? Even that time frame alone is discouraging.



As for IP protection, it's again a bit of a necessity. The easiest example is Mickey Mouse, so we'll start there. Technically, under the old laws, and IP protection Disney had should have expired years ago. But Disney is basically built on the Mickey brand. What would happen if Mickey became public property? Every jackass would be profitting by creating legal Mickey merch. You'd have porn with Mickey. Legally. What would that do to Disney? To the brand? To the company?
Disney would be ruined. Jobs would be lost. It's not like they're sitting on the IP, wasting it, they're actively using and capitalizing on it. It would be unfair to them to give it to the public. It would have discouraged their building him as far as they did.

Take it to videogames now. What if the same thing were to happen to Mario? Suddenly the shelves are full of games starring Mario. These are all legal, unlicensed games thrown together by the makers of Bible Quest. Some feature nudity, some feature scripture, none feature fun.
Mario sales die. Mario is no longer a sign of a good game, usually quite the opposite. Look what five years of crappy games did to Sonic or Lara Croft.

Yes, giving a game for free is different, but the concept and the laws are the same. What, did you expect that they laws would have magically changed in 2000? Of course not. None of this was relevant 15 years ago because, like movies, old games still sold as well as new games. Technology started moving quicker and old games became dated faster. Syndicate would no longer sell well, partially because it's almost painful on your eyes the first 10 minutes, partially because you have to jump through hoops to get it to run.
But this is a recent problem.
Laws haven't adapted because there's been no need. Congress is wasting enough time on baseball steroids, do you really want them to focus on letting you play games now?


Don't blame the lawyers. The laws are good. Blame the corporations for blindly hiding behind them. Nothing says EA can't start giving it's old games away if they wanted to. It's the executives that think it will damage them somehow. I'm not sure how, seems pretty obvious that making a formerly great game free will only renew interest in the IP, but I'm sure they have their rationale.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
8.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
31.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
2.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
3.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
4.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
6.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
7.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
9.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
15.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
16.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
20.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
21.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
23.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
30.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
24.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
153.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
        Re: No subject
27.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
29.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
28.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
25.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
18.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
19.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
22.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
36.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
26.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
45.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
56.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
59.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
70.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
152.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
        Re: No subject
78.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
82.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
89.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
94.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
101.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
11.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
12.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
33.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
35.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
37.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
38.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
40.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
41.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
44.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
60.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
64.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
149.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
        Re: No subject
150.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
         Re: No subject
151.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
          Re: No subject
154.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
           Re: No subject
65.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
148.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
        Re: No subject
48.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
5.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
10.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
13.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
14.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
17.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
32.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
34.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
55.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
155.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
39.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
42.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
43.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
46.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
112.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
47.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
50.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
90.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
113.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
49.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
54.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
57.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
66.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
   Re: wtf
73.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
    Re: wtf
75.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: wtf
77.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
80.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: wtf
156.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
   Re: wtf
51.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
52.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
62.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
69.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
74.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
53.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
58.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
61.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
68.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
71.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
116.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
118.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
119.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
120.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
     Re: No subject
63.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
67.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
72.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
79.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
87.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
91.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
   Re: Well
92.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
   Re: Well
76.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
81.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
83.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
84.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
85.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
86.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
93.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
126.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
97.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
157.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
158.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
88.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
95.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
96.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
98.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
99.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
100.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
104.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
105.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
106.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
107.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
108.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
109.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
129.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
       Re: No subject
130.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
        Re: No subject
110.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
111.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
114.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
147.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
102.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
103.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
117.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
115.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
121.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
122.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
123.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
124.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
125.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
127.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
128.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
139.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
131.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
132.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
133.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
134.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
 140.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
   Re: No subject
141.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
145.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
135.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
136.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
137.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
138.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
142.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
143.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
144.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
146.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
159.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
160.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
161.
Jan 8, 2008Jan 8 2008
162.
Mar 19, 2008Mar 19 2008
163.
Mar 11, 2009Mar 11 2009