Universal Combat Freeware

Universal Combat is now available as a freeware release, as promised a couple of weeks ago (story). Word from 3000AD is: "Once again, our freeware game is released with no advertising, no nag screens, no expiration date, nothing. Just the full (and patched) single player game as was commercially released in Feb 2004, but with fewer music tracks (the game FAQ shows how players can add their own MP3 tracks) and no multiplayer." The download is available on Atomic Gamer, AusGamers, ComputerGames.ro, FanGaming, FileFront, Gamer's Hell, and Strategy Informer.
View : : :
78.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 2, 2008, 18:15
78.
Re: No subject Jan 2, 2008, 18:15
Jan 2, 2008, 18:15
 
Is it possible to post a criticism of a dsmart game without having your intelligence attacked by him in response?

No. Why? Because there is a big difference between criticism and harrassment. Not to mention libel and/or slander. If you have any common sense, let alone a Ph.D (as you seemed to indicate below) my guess is that you know the difference between the two. No?

I'd much rather see a discussion of why the UI was made as it was and why it shouldn't be dumbed down, other than just saying its a "niche" game.

And what exactly makes you think that there is something wrong with UI? Have you actually played ANY of the games in either the Battlecruiser or Universal Combat series?

Go take a gander at the docs below and draw your own conclusions.

Look, game development is not about building a better mouse trap. Its mostly about adapting to and building on an already established - and better - mouse trap. Each application UI is designed to work in the best possible manner for the app its designed for. e.g. I prefer PaintShop Pro's interface/UI to the widely popular Photoshop. The GimpShop interface/UI is for morons on acid. But you don't see me harrassing the developers of either of those products; apart from the fact that I have in fact used ALL of them at some point or another. Unlike most here who just think its fun to poke someone with a stick, then cry foul when that person growls back.

So please, spare me the righteousness. If everyone's life were under a scope, I'm quite certain that we'd all find something to complain about. And unlike this anti-social misfits, I'm not a faceless and unaccountable anon. I stand by everything I say/post. And you don't have to like it. I'm not in a popularity contest. I'm just a regular human being cruising through life and making a difference where I can. So if you folks want to hold me to a higher standard, thats your problem, not mine. Because I don't give a shit.

Do you really think that there would be 8+ million people playing WoW if the interface was anything but intuitive? You press asdw to move and click on icons to perform actions.

You're an idiot, you know that? What makes you think that you can't use WSAD to contol any of my games? Oh, thats right, you wouldn't know since you haven't actually played them.

Below are the docs for the recently released UC freeware upon which ALL the games in that series are based. Go ahead, show us how stupid you look.

http://www.3000ad.com/downloads/uc/UC_KEYBOARD_CMDS.PDF
http://www.3000ad.com/downloads/uc/UC_MANUAL.PDF
http://www.3000ad.com/downloads/uc/UC_TUTORIAL.PDF

Of course the Blizzard developers aren't openly hostile to users, don't spew vulgarities in public forums, and generally have a better idea of how to tailor a product to make it accessible. Sadly those are concepts you've never shown an interest in understanding.

Thats right, I'm not a poster boy for the PC corporate culture. And who are you again?

Its easy to judge someone from safely behind the confines of an anon glass house.

And that rubbish you posted comparing Blizzard devs is just that, rubbish. I suppose its better to ignore users (only an obtuse tit would take one look at the WoW forums and not see that the comparisons are Apples to Oranges) than to engage them on their own turf and in the only language they understand.

You may need a refresher course on Derek Smart. So here it is: Noboby puts me under siege. nobody. You come at me with a baseball bat, I'm bring an ICBM. Overkill, yeah. Thats why boys don't play games with men.

You frigging retards think that all of us [devs] have to take your shit. PLUS, I'm not the only dev who lashes out from time to time. It just so happens that, well, I'm one of the early starters.

This message was edited at Jan 2, 14:39.


Did anyone else read all that?

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
8.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
31.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
2.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
3.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
4.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
6.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
7.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
9.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
15.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
16.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
20.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
21.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
23.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
30.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
24.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
153.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
        Re: No subject
27.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
29.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
28.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
25.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
18.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
19.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
22.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
36.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
26.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
45.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
56.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
59.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
70.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
152.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
        Re: No subject
 78.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
    Re: No subject
82.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
89.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
94.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
101.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
        Re: No subject
11.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
12.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
33.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
35.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
37.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
38.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
40.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
41.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
44.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
60.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
64.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
149.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
        Re: No subject
150.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
         Re: No subject
151.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
          Re: No subject
154.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
           Re: No subject
65.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
       Re: No subject
148.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
        Re: No subject
48.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
5.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
10.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
13.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
14.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
17.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
32.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
34.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
55.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
155.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
39.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
42.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
43.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
46.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
112.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
47.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
50.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
90.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
113.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
49.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
54.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
57.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
66.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
   Re: wtf
73.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
    Re: wtf
75.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: wtf
77.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
80.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: wtf
156.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
   Re: wtf
51.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
52.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
62.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
69.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
74.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
53.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
58.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
61.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
68.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
71.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
116.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
118.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
119.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
120.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
     Re: No subject
63.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
67.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
72.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
79.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
87.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
91.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
   Re: Well
92.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
   Re: Well
76.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
81.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
83.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
84.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
85.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
86.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
93.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
126.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
97.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
157.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
158.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
88.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
95.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
96.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
98.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
99.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
100.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
104.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
105.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
106.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
107.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
108.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
109.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
      Re: No subject
129.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
       Re: No subject
130.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
        Re: No subject
110.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
     Re: No subject
111.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
114.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
147.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
102.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
103.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
117.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
115.
Jan 2, 2008Jan 2 2008
121.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
122.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
123.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
124.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
125.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
127.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
128.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
139.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
131.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
132.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
133.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
134.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
140.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
141.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
145.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
135.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
136.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
137.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
138.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
142.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
143.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
144.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
146.
Jan 3, 2008Jan 3 2008
159.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
160.
Jan 4, 2008Jan 4 2008
161.
Jan 8, 2008Jan 8 2008
162.
Mar 19, 2008Mar 19 2008
163.
Mar 11, 2009Mar 11 2009