The Truth About BioShock Widescreen

The Cult of Rapture has a lengthy post on "the truth" about widescreen issues in BioShock (story). Apparently this was a design decision, though it sounds like 2K is contemplating an official fix. In the meantime, a homebrew workaround is available (story). Here's word:
We understand there has been some concern about the implementation of widescreen mode in BioShock. Hopefully, we can clarify how we’ve chosen to do this.

The first thing we want to make clear is the mode we developed the game on and the optimal mode for playing the game is the widescreen mode. 90% of our development stations were widescreen displays: artists, programmers and designers.

- BioShock was primarily developed and tuned for widescreen mode. Artists and designers worked with widescreen displays and chose a field of view (FOV) that best reflected their intentions with respect to the way the world is perceived, the perceived speed of movement of the player relative to the world and the amount of the world they wanted to be viewed for the best game-play experience. We went through dozens of iterations and finally settled upon a widescreen aspect ratio that best suited the gameplay experience.

- When playing in widescreen modes the game makes use of the full screen resolution, and does not crop or stretch a lower resolution image into a wide screen one. For example, at 720p the game renders natively to the full 1280x720 resolution.

- Once this FOV was established, we chose to keep exactly the same horizontal FOV for standard def displays, so as not to in any way alter the gameplay experience.

- Instead of cropping the FOV for 4:3 displays and making all 4:3 owners mad in doing so, we slightly extended the vertical FOV for standard def mode: we never wanted to have black bars on people’s displays. (This way, everybody is happy…) This does mean that people playing on a standard def display see slightly more vertical space, but, this does not significantly affect the game-play experience and, we felt that it best served our goal of keeping the game experience as close as possible to the original design and art vision on both types of displays. Reports of the widescreen FOV being a crop of the 4:3 FOV are completely false.

One thing we can assure you that all these decisions were made with the best interests of the game in mind. We didn’t save any money or development time by choosing this set of parameters. We did what we thought was the best thing for the game: developing and optimizing it for widescreen displays, and making the decision not to do the usual crop for 4:3 displays. As a consumer, you certainly have the right to disagree.

We understand that not all users might not be happy with these choices and we will be looking into options for allowing users to adjust FOV settings manually. But as we mentioned earlier, changes to video game code do not happen in minutes or hours. We appreciate your understanding.
View : : :
26.
 
No subject
Aug 22, 2007, 18:41
26.
No subject Aug 22, 2007, 18:41
Aug 22, 2007, 18:41
 
Am I the only one not freaking out about this? The FOV is fine. This isn't Quake 3 where people have any reason to bump it up to a 120 deg FOV or something. All they did was increase vertical space for 4:3. Call them "tall screen" monitors if you will. No reason to flip out. "X" amount of pixels is "X" amount of pixels. They aren't robbing you of any.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
3.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
2.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
4.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
6.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
5.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
7.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
8.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
9.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
10.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
11.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
12.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
13.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
14.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
19.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
15.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
16.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
20.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
17.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
18.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
21.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
22.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
24.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
25.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
23.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
 26.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
No subject
27.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
28.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
29.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
30.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
31.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
36.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
43.
Aug 23, 2007Aug 23 2007
     Re: No subject
32.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
33.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
34.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
35.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
37.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
39.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
40.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
42.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
44.
Aug 23, 2007Aug 23 2007
45.
Aug 23, 2007Aug 23 2007
38.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
41.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
46.
Aug 23, 2007Aug 23 2007