BioShock Widescreen Woes

Widescreen messed up ... on the 2K Forums has hundreds of posts about problems with widescreen monitor support in BioShock impacting both PC and Xbox 360 owners. At issue is how images are expanded and cropped to accommodate widescreen modes, meaning widescreen users actually get less image than fullscreen users, a situation bordering on irony. There is no good news from 2K or the studio formerly known as Irrational on the forum, and our attempt to contact 2K about this directly has met with no response so far.
View : : :
16.
 
It gets even better
Aug 21, 2007, 23:41
16.
It gets even better Aug 21, 2007, 23:41
Aug 21, 2007, 23:41
 
""You will see more in widescreen. We use a different projection matrix; there is no squashing or stretching of the image involved."

"The game will render in full 16:9 aspect ratio, with no letterboxing unless your resolution is not true 16:9."

"Folks, don't fret, there's no letterboxing in 4:3, nor in 16:9. The game will use the most bad-ass resolution available to your video card and monitor."

- Chris Kline, Lead Programmer, Bioshock"

http://forums.2kgames.com/forums/showthread.php?t=659

From the 2K forum, awhile back.


I remember someone else saying crap like this. What was he called again. Oh yeah, Warren Spector. "Deus Ex 2 is not dumbed down!"

This is the laziest "implementation" of widescreen I've had the misfortune to watch in the last three or so years, barring EA's complete ignorance. Well done, Irrational. Way to take the lazy ass way out.

Creston

Edit 2 : "To be fair, I was playing it on my new beautiful 22 WS LCD monitor without a problem. "

Noone is saying that it gives a "problem" as in the game becomes unplayable because of it. However, in the year 2007, with a sizeable number of people now actually having widescreen monitors, implementing a widescreen "solution" that makes you SEE LESS than you would on a normal monitor is just fucking ridiculous.

And apparently nobody noticed this in testing? I guess a widescreen monitor for their testing lab was way too expensive. They tested it on a $300 Dell, and the secretary's old Compaq, apparently.

This comment was edited on Aug 21, 23:44.
Avatar 15604
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
2.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
3.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
7.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
6.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
8.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
9.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
10.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
18.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
19.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
21.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
23.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
    Re: Great.
27.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
     Re: Great.
28.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
      Re: Great.
29.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
       Re: Great.
32.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        Re: Great.
36.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
         Re: Great.
55.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
          Re: Great.
102.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
           Re: Great.
30.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
      Re: Great.
33.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
       Re: Great.
37.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        Re: Great.
43.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
         Re: Great.
34.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
       Re: Great.
31.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
      Re: Great.
38.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
       Re: Great.
40.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
       Re: Great.
42.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        SOB
45.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        Re: Great.
41.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
       Re: Great.
44.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        Re: Great.
53.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
56.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
62.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
11.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
12.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
13.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
14.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
15.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
 16.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
It gets even better
17.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
20.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
35.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
22.
Aug 21, 2007Aug 21 2007
24.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
25.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
26.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
51.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
52.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
   Re: eh...
39.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
47.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
48.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
49.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
50.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
46.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
57.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
58.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
59.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
60.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
63.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
64.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
66.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
69.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
70.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
71.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
74.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
75.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
76.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
       Posts 51-75...
77.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        Re: Posts 51-75...
104.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        Re: Posts 51-75...
105.
Aug 25, 2007Aug 25 2007
         No subject
78.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
85.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
        Letterbox vs 4:3
87.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
         Re: Letterbox vs 4:3
88.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
          Re: Letterbox vs 4:3
89.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
           Re: Letterbox vs 4:3
91.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
            Re: Letterbox vs 4:3
90.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
          Re: Letterbox vs 4:3
79.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
72.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
101.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
103.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
61.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
65.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
67.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
68.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
73.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
81.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
80.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
82.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
83.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
84.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
86.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
92.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
93.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
95.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
96.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
98.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
99.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
94.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
97.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
100.
Aug 22, 2007Aug 22 2007
106.
Aug 28, 2007Aug 28 2007