NIMF on Manhunt 2

The National Institute on Media and the Family has issued a statement relating to the AO rating given to Manhunt 2, and the subsequent fallout of that decision. In gloating: "Hopefully Take-Two has learned from its Manhunt 2 experience and will undertake preventive measures to ensure its future games, including Grand Theft Auto IV, are appropriate for families and gamers," they seem to be opining that there aren't any adult gamers, so games targeted at adults are inappropriate:
Minneapolis - The National Institute on Media and the Family today released the following statement in response to Take-Two Interactive Software’s decision to “temporarily suspend” distribution of Manhunt 2. This announcement was in response to the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) issuing an “Adults-Only” rating for the game and Nintendo and Sony’s decisions to deny Manhunt 2 a license for their products.

“Take-Two’s decision to temporarily suspend distribution of Manhunt 2 is a victory for parents and children.

“Because of the their thoughtful decision to give Manhunt 2 its strongest rating, “Adults-Only,” the ESRB has sent a strong message to Take-Two and other game makers that they no longer can push the envelope on gratuitous violence in video games. The ESRB showed real leadership in assigning this rating and further evidence it is making significant progress in keeping extremely violent and graphic materials out of children’s hands.

“Hopefully Take-Two has learned from its Manhunt 2 experience and will undertake preventive measures to ensure its future games, including Grand Theft Auto IV, are appropriate for families and gamers.

“As gaming technology continues to change, we hope to continue to work with the ESRB to ensure that future games have appropriate content and context for children. The uniqueness of Nintendo’s Wii gives game raters a new challenge when it comes to first-player shooter games. We take the ESRB’s decision about Manhunt 2 as a positive step in addressing this new challenge.”
View : : :
30.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 23, 2007, 13:57
30.
Re: No subject Jun 23, 2007, 13:57
Jun 23, 2007, 13:57
 
Holy hell, I hope you're not indicative of the rest of the UK.

"It's simply been decided by a governing body that the game serves no real value..."

That's the problem buddy.

Avatar 17249
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
2.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
3.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
4.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
5.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
6.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
8.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
11.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
12.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
13.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
19.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
20.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
     Re: No subject
21.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
      Re: No subject
24.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
33.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
14.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
15.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
16.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
17.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
18.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
     Re: No subject
22.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
      Re: No subject
25.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
       Re: No subject
26.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
        Re: No subject
27.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
        Re: No subject
9.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
10.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
23.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
28.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
 30.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
 Re: No subject
31.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
29.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
32.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
34.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
39.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
41.
Jun 25, 2007Jun 25 2007
  ...
35.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
36.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
37.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
38.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
40.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007