NIMF on Manhunt 2

The National Institute on Media and the Family has issued a statement relating to the AO rating given to Manhunt 2, and the subsequent fallout of that decision. In gloating: "Hopefully Take-Two has learned from its Manhunt 2 experience and will undertake preventive measures to ensure its future games, including Grand Theft Auto IV, are appropriate for families and gamers," they seem to be opining that there aren't any adult gamers, so games targeted at adults are inappropriate:
Minneapolis - The National Institute on Media and the Family today released the following statement in response to Take-Two Interactive Software’s decision to “temporarily suspend” distribution of Manhunt 2. This announcement was in response to the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) issuing an “Adults-Only” rating for the game and Nintendo and Sony’s decisions to deny Manhunt 2 a license for their products.

“Take-Two’s decision to temporarily suspend distribution of Manhunt 2 is a victory for parents and children.

“Because of the their thoughtful decision to give Manhunt 2 its strongest rating, “Adults-Only,” the ESRB has sent a strong message to Take-Two and other game makers that they no longer can push the envelope on gratuitous violence in video games. The ESRB showed real leadership in assigning this rating and further evidence it is making significant progress in keeping extremely violent and graphic materials out of children’s hands.

“Hopefully Take-Two has learned from its Manhunt 2 experience and will undertake preventive measures to ensure its future games, including Grand Theft Auto IV, are appropriate for families and gamers.

“As gaming technology continues to change, we hope to continue to work with the ESRB to ensure that future games have appropriate content and context for children. The uniqueness of Nintendo’s Wii gives game raters a new challenge when it comes to first-player shooter games. We take the ESRB’s decision about Manhunt 2 as a positive step in addressing this new challenge.”
View : : :
22.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 23, 2007, 02:02
22.
Re: No subject Jun 23, 2007, 02:02
Jun 23, 2007, 02:02
 
If GTA4 faces a similar situation, there could potentially be enough backlash to prompt some sort of re-evaluation of the system itself.
However, I don't anticipate GTA4 going down that path in the first place. (Perhaps unfortunately.)


Rockstar got kicked in the nuts and they're hurting. The silly talk about them doing this deliberately to provoke a reaction is wish fulfillment. We're not talking about Pepsico or IBM here - Rockstar could find itself shutdown in a matter of months and it won't make even the slightest ripple in the market. Making a game which is banned outright in the UK (W T F?)and effectively banned in the US is a retarded decision for a company which has to keep its investor's happy. GTA4 will be cushions and safety swings after this or they don't exist anymore.

For what it's worth I think the decision to ban Manhunt 2 in the UK is completely wrong. I have no desire to play the game and had nothing to do with the first one either but a game is a game is a game. These aren't murder simulators or we should be banning kids from playing cops and robbers or whatever the equivalent is today.

In the UK it's compulsory for a game to get a rating and that rating represents a legally binding age limit that a retailer can be heavily fined for breaking. Banning a game outright is just pandering to the attention whores in the media and I hope whoever came up with that decision gets fucked out of the BBFC ASAP.

And finally, as everybody knows serial killers are inspired by the Beatles not by video games. Ban music.


EDIT: oh and if the "National Institute on Media and the Family" hadn't issued a press release condemning Manhunt 2 they wouldn't exactly be doing their jobs now would they? More to the point, who the fuck are the National Institute on Media and the Family and have you even heard of them before now? Is it one angry guy posting self righteous hatemail in his underwear? Or two?
This comment was edited on Jun 23, 02:05.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
2.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
3.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
4.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
5.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
6.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
8.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
11.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
12.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
13.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
19.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
20.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
     Re: No subject
21.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
      Re: No subject
24.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
33.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
14.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
15.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
16.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
17.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
18.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
     Re: No subject
 22.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
      Re: No subject
25.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
       Re: No subject
26.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
        Re: No subject
27.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
        Re: No subject
9.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
10.
Jun 22, 2007Jun 22 2007
23.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
28.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
30.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
31.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
29.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
32.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
34.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
39.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
41.
Jun 25, 2007Jun 25 2007
  ...
35.
Jun 23, 2007Jun 23 2007
36.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
37.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
38.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007
40.
Jun 24, 2007Jun 24 2007