Orson Scott Card Q&A

The Orson Scott Card Q&A on Gaming Today (thanks Mike Martinez) talks with the author about his writing for books and games as well as his gaming addiction: "My cold-turkey stop was because, and I'm serious here, it was costing me a shocking amount of money and depriving me of a home life with my family. Here I am, a self-employed writer, and I never had time for my family because I had this GAME that was waiting to seduce me whenever I pretended I was going to the office to work. I estimate there are about twenty novels that were never written because of computer games. Now, there are those who think that's a blessing to literature, but at the very least it was costing me money because I wasn't getting paid as often as when I actually complete the books that are under contract."
View : : :
8.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 17, 2007, 01:51
8.
Re: No subject Jun 17, 2007, 01:51
Jun 17, 2007, 01:51
 
I can't really speak for his books outside of Ender's Game, as it was the only book by him I ever read. I will say he writes for comic books fairly well, Ultimate Iron Man was quite original.

And back to the original subject, as bad as games are to his career, what he should be worrying about is we probably have a generation coming up that never read for fun. Those very same games that stop him from writing books also stop people from reading.

I work with a lot of teenagers, and I don't think I have heard any of them EVER talk about a new book they read in idle conversation. My own experience is I haven't read a book for fun since I bought my first computer for gaming back when Quake 1 came out. I do it a lot for school, but never of my own free will. Up until Quake 1 came out, I read about a book or 2 a week. Afterwards, I think I trailed off and just stopped in the late 90s. Anyone else have a similar experience?

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 16, 2007Jun 16 2007
2.
Jun 16, 2007Jun 16 2007
3.
Jun 16, 2007Jun 16 2007
4.
Jun 16, 2007Jun 16 2007
5.
Jun 16, 2007Jun 16 2007
7.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
 8.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
     Re: No subject
11.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
      Re: No subject
6.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
9.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
10.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
12.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
13.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
15.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
16.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
18.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007
17.
Jun 17, 2007Jun 17 2007