2 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older
2.
 
Well, duh.
May 30, 2007, 19:15
2.
Well, duh. May 30, 2007, 19:15
May 30, 2007, 19:15
 
Well, duh. What was the SFPD thinking? Those of us in Pennsylvania on the job have known for quite a while that cell phones fall under "persons, papers, or items" and that a warrant is required.

Don't start anything you can't finish. Preferably to component atoms.
Avatar 15305
1.
 
Warrant
May 30, 2007, 12:59
1.
Warrant May 30, 2007, 12:59
May 30, 2007, 12:59
 
Wow. And here I thought we got rid of the fourth amendment years ago?

2 Replies. 1 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  ] Older