And that's how you make a game PC gamers will love...

Had a close friend at Nvidia play this, said it TOTALLY sucked. He meant to whole game, not just one aspect. After seeing the videos, it looks good but the movement of the robots, from the inside, looks like a joke!

Hope they get this all fixed.

Quick, someone throw together a Blues Clan.

i'm game, but what would we use as a clan website?

i'm game, but what would we use as a clan website?

www.goggle.com

(don't go there if you are unprotected)

This comment was edited on Mar 20, 23:35.

Have 2 clans looking to do this.

Hopefully one will get it.

**********************************************
I Am Trying to Believe - April 17th, 2007

"Re: Played Mar 20, 23:35 Bludd

i'm game, but what would we use as a clan website?
www.goggle.com

(don't go there if you are unprotected)"

Why post a link to a site that needs a disclaimer? What a fucking moron.

Somebody clicked it didn't they

So one aspect of the game "the movement of the robots" makes the game "TOTALLY suck"?

That's kind of funny...

This comment was edited on Mar 21, 10:10.

Fist thing to get disabled in MP games, bots.

Second thing after that, I add to filter list, bot count = 0 for game servers.

I dont purcahse MP games to play AI, I purchase to play other sheeple.

Adding bot code to a game for a Multiplayer environment is just a waste of developer resources and time, since its a dead code path.


This comment was edited on Mar 21, 05:48.

So one aspect of the game "the movement of the robots" makes the game "TOTALLY suck"?

It might pay to actually read what he wrote again. He said a friend played and said it totally sucked, and that when he watched the vids he felt that the movement of the robots looks like a joke.

People have hyped this game up so much to themselves, that any negativity prior to it's release gets slammed. They just can't take it atall well, because time and time again what with having to deal with one shit game after another, it's all been about how QW will save the day. There's no slagging this game off - not without being flamed.

If you let yourself get caught up in the hype in this industry, you're fucked. The best games you've ever played are the ones that you didn't see coming. You know it, and I know it.

Adding bot code to a game for a Multiplayer environment is just a waste of developer resources and time, since its a dead code path

Define dead code path.

I purchase MP games to play alone or (if I'm lanning) with other people against AI, not the least because bots don't chuck hissy fits when they're getting their asses kicked.

They're great for filling out the teams when you'd much rather just play with friends, rather than risking going up against the average cockheads you'll meet on an online server.

You're welcome to steer well away from bot-infested servers, but don't even try that "waste of developer resources" shit around here. There are far more people playing in games filled with bots than you could possibly imagine.

Bots are just a waste of server slots which could be filled by real players, if they must have bots I hope the server kills the bot if a real player wants to join.

Owning a real player is far more satisfying than AI and ever since T2 bots (wall humpers) I just dislike them, period.

I do hope the servers support a Queueing system for new players wanting to join, I am tired clicking refresh or juggling between 2 servers to get the player count refreshed in order to join one, and having the ping and player counts update frequently so we dont have to keep refreshing would be nice for the currently selected server.

I am mostly referring to internet play not LAN games, anyway, it is harder to predict people than it is AI.

That brings up another request, I want the ability to IGNORE text, voice binds and audio voice from specific players (tard spammers mostly), and vote spammers. Blocking delays are not good enough, I want total control over an ignore list for that game session.


This comment was edited on Mar 21, 07:23.

That brings up another request, I want the ability to IGNORE text, voice binds and audio voice from specific players (tard spammers mostly), and vote spammers. Blocking delays are not good enough, I want total control over an ignore list for that game session.


If your refering to BF2, then I agree wholeheartedly........most annoying thing ever is commander saying "Infantry spotted" every 2 seconds

Or how about "enemy boat spotted"? In the middle of land? On infantry only?

Ahh I sees you have had the BattleVote 2: Special Retards experience then

The only clans ID Software should even consider are those from Red Orchestra. Those guys really communicate well. And they take it seriously.

They'll be like, "I'm taking fire in the trenches, I can see 2 guys up above them in the trees. I'm going to try to back out of here. I'll meet you at the trench entrance & we'll flank them on the high ground."

Instead of other games where teenagers whose balls just dropped are like, "OMG WTF, there's some fags up above the trenches, I need backup!"

They actually type all that?

I would be happy just to have the option to DISABLE the text box COMPLETELY, if they want to communicate, use an IM or TeamChat server or something built in, I dont want to participate with children screaming in a half pubic voice that Im a tard thank you very much, and the whiney American accents.

Most of the time I end up taking my headphones off and leaving the sound off.

This comment was edited on Mar 21, 09:27.

Sorry but I absolutely hate bots in multiplayer games servers. Here is why...

You open up the server browser. 100 servers with people playing on them. Maybe 10 people per server. You pick one, yeah all 10 people were bots. So you say bah i'll stay.

Someone else does the same thing but joins one of the other 99 servers and so on and so forth, thus theres actually say a good 40 people playing but they are scattered throughout 100 servers playing with bots instead of playing with others...

Its just simply STUPID. It ruined TFC IMO

"Owning a real player is far more satisfying than AI"

This actually USED to be the case. That was until peeps decided finding every glitch and hack in the book to beat other players at any cost became the norm.

In games like Armed Assault etc, I prefer to play against the A.I. cause they always play incharacter. In a straightforward Quaker, the gameplay is meant to be played like a wackoff session. But even so, you`ll always find legions of asshats who get wood not from just playing the game as intended, but glitching etc etc etc.