Valve on Games for Windows

Valve questions Microsoft's commitment to PC gaming on GamesIndustry.biz offers analysis of their Q&A with Valve's Doug Lombardi that question's whether Redmond's support for PC gaming is genuine, or an effort at marketing Vista:
"Right now it seems like it's part of the marketing push to help Vista," commented Doug Lombardi, marketing manager at Valve, in an exclusive interview for GamesIndustry.biz.

"To really back a platform is a sustained effort over years and years, so we'll see if in two years Microsoft is still spending money to put Games for Windows sections in retail, and having PR people preach that message that the PC isn't dying, it’s actually bigger than all the consoles put together."

"You know, if it were to sign up for that, that's great. If it's going to use it to promote sales of Vista, that's really not good for the industry, it's good for Microsoft in the short term," offered Lombardi.
View : : :
32.
 
Vista
Mar 13, 2007, 08:33
32.
Vista Mar 13, 2007, 08:33
Mar 13, 2007, 08:33
 
Heya, just throwing out my personal experience here with Vista after having it for about a month now. I installed Vista Business edition onto a new system after replacing my old motherboard, hard drives, video, and RAM.

First, in regards to the UAC security feature it does not prompt you on every single little thing you do, that is false. Normally the UAC appears for me during one of two things: when installing new software it prompts to verify I want to install something and also when I try to access system utilities that will be interacting directly with the OS DLLs or kernel (for example, various administration tools).

When I am browsing the 'Net or running a game I don't see the UAC at all. Some might see the UAC thing as a hassle and a waste of time but my thought on this -- for what its worth -- is that this is a new Microsoft product which is normally a touchy thing especially in regards to security. So, something like the UAC isn't too bad of an idea if it will help prevent malware or trojans from being allowed to automatically install themselves onto a Windows system.
It can also be bypassed or turned off completely via Local Security Policies but I'm a bit hesitant to do that, again because this is a new Microsoft product.

I did have problems running the C&C3 demo but this was fixed by installing the DirectX 9.0c program files. The demo wanted some DX9 files that Vista obviously doesn't have but by instaling DX9 the game then worked without any further errors or prblems.

The other few games I play right now like EQ2 and Defcon show no signs of problems while playing either. I tested Doom 3 as well and that ran good too.

As far as the Aero interface and gadgets I kind of like them despite the extra overhead they add to memory. Right now when I run the Aero desktop and gadgets that eats up another 50-60 Megs of RAM. When idle, my PC averages a usage of about 500Megs of RAM (that includes a/v software running the background, the various gadgets I have and other startup programs). Of course, the way Vista handles RAM and the way XP handles it are quite a bit different which might explain why it even uses that much RAM.

Now, I'm not saying everyone should get Vista right away. Far from it. If you have XP there's really no reason to get it unless you just absolutely have to have the newest thing and you just absolutely want to try things like ReadyBoost or Speedboost that come with Vista.

But for somone like me who was running Windows 2000 and was building a new PC, Vista might be worth your time to check out.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
2.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
3.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
10.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
13.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
27.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
19.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
20.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
21.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
25.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
60.
Mar 15, 2007Mar 15 2007
61.
Mar 18, 2007Mar 18 2007
62.
Mar 18, 2007Mar 18 2007
4.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
5.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
6.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
11.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
7.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
8.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
9.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
37.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
   Re: ...
12.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
15.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
   Re: ...
14.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
18.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
16.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
17.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
22.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
24.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
53.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
   Re: Vi$ta
26.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
28.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
   Re: Vi$ta
45.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
   Re: Vi$ta
23.
Mar 12, 2007Mar 12 2007
29.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
34.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
30.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
31.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
33.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
 32.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
Vista
35.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
36.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
38.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
39.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
40.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
42.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
44.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
47.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
48.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
49.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
     Re: No subject
41.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
43.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
46.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
51.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
52.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
54.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
55.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
56.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
     Re: No subject
57.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
      Re: No subject
58.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007
      Re: No subject
59.
Mar 14, 2007Mar 14 2007
       Re: No subject
50.
Mar 13, 2007Mar 13 2007