Then why do you generalize and say that the industry would make more "good" games if only "good" games would get bought?
"Good" is always subjective. If the industry makes games I like, which is more likely to happen if I only buy the ones I like, that means they are making "good" games. Whether you like the game is completely irrelevant.
You need to risk that a game is not entirely to your liking.
No, I don't. That's why I pirate games. I eliminate the risk of buying a game I won't enjoy.
There is always a little risk involved in a purchase. Always.
Wrong again. Games, movies, books, music... all can be tested in their entirety before purchase. Legally? Usually not (though, borrowing a book from a library tends to be legal). But then, legality isn't the issue here. Practicality and reason is.
You have absolutely no right to cicumvent that risk by pirating a game.
Here we go again with these "rights." As I said before, using rights as the basis of your argument is pointless because "rights" are abstract notions that are vary wildly from culture to culture. Take away culture and rights cease to exist. Lock yourself in a cage with an angry tiger and see how far your rights get you.
Why do you believe that you are entitled to such a special privilege (risk-free, satisfaction guaranteed money spending) when it comes to games?
Entitled? As with rights, I don't believe I'm entitled to anything. I play through games before I buy them because piracy enables me to do so. It is not a matter of rights or entitlement. This isn't a matter of right and wrong. It is a matter of minimizing risk and ensuring that every game I buy is well worth it. Like I said, if it were possible to test all things with this same level of thoroughness, I would. Unfortunately, I can't.
You're just a filthy little thief who is trying to justify his lameness.
Again with the insults. If you want to hurt my feelings, just successfully refute my points with logic (not proclamations of rights and entitlements).