Since the subject of contribution of "open source" was brought up, why not bring up these as examples of companies with interest in these technology stacks contributing to them instead of the "user", in this case the gamer, I think it is absurd to expect a gamer / user / customer to contribute code to the technology stack. That actually is laughable, even if they could, you really think they can get it in the mainline branch. Lolerskates. Good luck with that And even more laughable, they sit wondering why nobody is using their technolgoy, in this case, OpenGL. Gee , lets think. I wonder why.

IBM and various other companies with interest contribute to Linux.

Nvidia and AMD and Epic and various other companies with interest can contribute to OpenGL.

Same principles apply whether it is gaming or not.

But no, you expect the GAMER, people who play the games to actually do the contribution. Funniest thing I have heard ever.

That is like asking the artist Andy Warhol to contribute to GIMP.


Why have a discussion about PC's and gaming as gaming is just for consoles, not personal computers whether it is Windows, Linux or OS X.


How many games hit Windows PC's, not many compared to the console market, how many games hit OS X, not many as OpenGL is dead, how many hit Linux, not many because of their open source attitude and OpenGL is dead.

This site should be for consoles only as gaming on personal computers won't exist at this rate


This comment was edited on Jan 28, 15:00.