America's Army: Coalition Released

A new version of America's Army is now available, bringing the U.S. Army's freeware shooter/recruiting tool to version 2.8 and once again changing its subtitle, which is now Coalition. The new version includes a new mission editor, offers a pair of tutorial maps, and incorporates a number of bug fixes and other improvements. There is a patch to update version 2.7, available on 3D Gamers, FileFront, and Internode Games Network, while a new full installer that tops out well over the 2 GB download limitation of many browsers is on 3D Gamers, FileFront, Gamer's Hell, Internode Games Network, and VGPRO.
View : : :
64 Replies. 4 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  ] Older
64.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 28, 2006, 09:10
nin
64.
Re: No subject Dec 28, 2006, 09:10
Dec 28, 2006, 09:10
nin
 
The democrats murdered more children last year than the US army ever has in it's entire existance. 1.6 million abortions.

What amazing trolling skilz...



-----------------------------------------------------
GW: Nilaar Madalla, lvl 20 R/Mo / Tolyl Nor, lvl 20 E/Mo / Xylos Gath, lvl 16 W/Mo

http://www.richardcheese.com/ http://www.myspace.com/richardcheese
63.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 28, 2006, 04:10
63.
Re: No subject Dec 28, 2006, 04:10
Dec 28, 2006, 04:10
 
Ah god that post should go down as one of the funniest ever made. Im sorry but Inkswitch you obviously have no ability to view anything withou prejudice or without the benefit of hindsight. Not only that you seem to be so ignorant of any issue that no matter what, everyone else must be a fundamentalist, crazy, abortion loving, hitler siding, democrat that liuves upon the blood of babies.

My connecting Christianity with anything does have validity. If you remember anything at all in that obviously one-thought at a time only mind, you'll notice that it relates to the statement of something like we have more to fear from christianity than Islam. And as such any connection validating my argument obviously has validity. Or does that concept escape you entirely as intellectual thought obviously seems to?

How about you read up on history on all subjects and get back to me. I'll give you a few pointers as to what areas to look in.

1: Creation of the Israeli state after WW2.

2: History of Christianity and that death toll it has created, in comparison to Islam and the death toll that has created.

Perhaps then you'll maybe understand why the Palestinians are the way they are doing the things they do.

Please though, post some more sweeping statements about me. Maybe i'm Hitler reborn? I'm actually an abortion doctor? you know something like that. It really does give me some chuckles.

I look forward with anticipation.

This comment was edited on Dec 28, 04:22.
62.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 27, 2006, 18:55
62.
Re: No subject Dec 27, 2006, 18:55
Dec 27, 2006, 18:55
 
Not wanting war is a valid sentiment. Not going to war when it is needed is short-sighted and foolish. WWII kinda validates my message. Wait, and you pay a heavier price.

Germany got raped by the treaty.........Ummmm maybe they deserved to get raped. Just like Japan deserved to surrender unconditionaly. That is what happens when you try to take over the world and lose. Do you feel sorry for Nazi Germany? Kinda seems like it. It wasn't a big secret that Germany was building it's armed forces for an offensive push. They were doing that for years. Prevention would have helped then. Just as preventing Iran from getting Nukes now should be our highest priority.

Your connecting Christianity with anything is completely invalid. I am not a Christian and absolutely support the war effort. You are obviously biggoted towards Christians. Your statements can only be read as such. Scarier still, you seem to think the Islamic fundamentalists are justified in their targeting of civilians. Very disturbing.

It doesn't surprise me at all that you would side with a Palestinian. Though, there really was never a palestine, nor a Palestinian people until Israel was established. Why would you side with a democratic nation who has to put armed soldiers in their schools because some nutball Muslim straps a bomb to him/herself and targets schoolchildren. It seems that you think targeting civilians specifically is a perfectly acceptable tactic. Perhaps it is. But, at least the US doesn't specifacally target civilians. There are casualties, but we try our hardest to avoid those.

By the way......The democrats murdered more children last year than the US army ever has in it's entire existance. 1.6 million abortions. Sigh. How enlightened you are. I am sure you tell yourself how superior you are while they are sucking your infants brains out.

61.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 27, 2006, 17:18
61.
Re: No subject Dec 27, 2006, 17:18
Dec 27, 2006, 17:18
 
Ah this should be easy.

1: After the First World War where the death toll (at the time) was inconcievable, people (as in everyone) did not want a repeat of it. As such they were prepared to resolve any and every problem with negotiation. They didn't want war, no-one did. Except the Germans, and they had a fucking good reason to go to war as well. They got absolutely raped (literally) by the Versailles treaty which was incredibly harsh. As such there was huge resentment in Germany towards the Allied nations, specifically France, and this leads me nicely onto point 2.

2: No matter what the Allies (UK, Russia, US, France etc) would have done, war would have broken out. And Germany would probably have done just as well even if the Allies did a pre-emptive strike. No matter what you think, the fact is the German army at that time was the most powerfull, best trained and most up-to-date army in the world. Nothing would have stopped their Blitzkrieg since no-one had seen that tactic used en-masse before.

3: "The West" did not sit around and do nothing until the cost was enormous. The US sat around and did nothing until the cost was enormous. If "the west" did nothing, then hell, the whole of Europe would now be under Nazi control.

5: No-one "let" the Nazis kill 6 million jews and capture most of western Europe. In case you didnt notice, at the time that the jews were being killed and western europe was being taken over, there were battles going on. People dying to stop the Nazis succeed in their mission.

4: I have no bias towards Christianity or Islam. I'm merely looking at the people who have the power. If I'm not mistaken, the world has to worry a lot more about President Bush and Tony Blair than "Al Queada". Suprise suprise Bush and Blair are both Christian. Hence my chuckling at your statement.

5: Doubtless you'll say terrorism is a big problem etc etc. Well hey, you are NEVER going to get rid of "terrorists". The fact is the West calls them terrorists whilst other people call the freedom fighters. And to be honest, if there was a Palestinian and an Israeli having an argument, i'd side with the Palestinian, but hey thats another debate entirely.


But all in all, i will probably wait for the reply you'll doubtless post with great anticipation to see what more sweeping, and frankly, idiotic statements you can come up with. I won't reply yo your post mind you as it is a tiresome waste of time since you seem unwilling to figure things out for yourself, and i really don't have the energy to waste.

60.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 27, 2006, 16:06
60.
Re: No subject Dec 27, 2006, 16:06
Dec 27, 2006, 16:06
 
Though, as an outside observer, I can say that you have far less to worry about from Christians than Muslims.
Ah that statement made me chuckle. Thought i had to point that out for no reason


What makes me chuckle is your obvious bigotry towards Christians.

Just a question, do you have any idea why the policy of appeasement was being so thoroughly used by most of the European countries before the outbreak of the second world war? If not, i suggest YOU read up on history.

Why don't you explain it to me. I love to hear rationalizations why the West (including the US) let Germany kill 6 million jews and capture most of western Eruope without lifting a finger until the cost was enormous.


59.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 26, 2006, 21:03
59.
Re: No subject Dec 26, 2006, 21:03
Dec 26, 2006, 21:03
 
Though, as an outside observer, I can say that you have far less to worry about from Christians than Muslims.

Ah that statement made me chuckle. Thought i had to point that out for no reason

And the whole post that contained this:

Try starting with Neville "We just need to talk with Hitler" Chamberlain. You people sound exactly like him.

Just a question, do you have any idea why the policy of appeasement was being so thoroughly used by most of the European countries before the outbreak of the second world war? If not, i suggest YOU read up on history.

This comment was edited on Dec 26, 21:08.
58.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 25, 2006, 19:04
58.
Re: No subject Dec 25, 2006, 19:04
Dec 25, 2006, 19:04
 
Thankfully, I can pick up a book, magazine, or other material with complete freedom.

Too bad most of the ME can't. Nor can the women get educations, vote, own anything, etc, etc.... That's the point, dipshit. Our policy doesn't matter when our very way of life threatens their power structure. Our being free threatens their power structure. Quite simple, really.

And, sorry, Muslims and Christians have been going at it for more than a thousand years. Plenty of atrocities on both sides. Though, I don't seem to see any Christians beheading people at the moment........Haven't seen any Christians hijack planes and fly them into buildings. The Catholic religion is a lot more progressive than Islam, to say the least.

And, I am an atheist. Both sides seem a tad wacky to me. Though, as an outside observer, I can say that you have far less to worry about from Christians than Muslims.

But, above all, you have the most to fear from appeasers and people who think that all things can be solved through dialogue. Sometimes they just can't.

See: Neville Chamberlain

57.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 25, 2006, 17:55
57.
Re: No subject Dec 25, 2006, 17:55
Dec 25, 2006, 17:55
 
Also, try pulling your heads out of your socialist asses and see that the vast majority of Muslims want you dead. Period. It's not what you or the US has done, it's who we are.

Hey welcome to the retard club. Maybe learn a thing or two about what the Muslim faith actually teaches before spewing your retoric. Just like with any faith, race or just in general human nature, there are bad people. Lumping Muslims together as you are doing is exactly how Bush has brainwashed the American public...but not all. His support numbers are dropping daily.

To put it simply, Catholocism and Christianity groups have committed far more genocide over the last 2000 years in the name of their faith than Muslim extremists ever have.

And actually, if you bother to educate yourself even a little bit it has everything to do with foreign policy. Pick up a book, newspaper, magazine, anything other than your comic books.

----------------------------------------------------
Currently playing Company of Heroes.
56.
 
Re: No subject
Dec 25, 2006, 09:02
56.
Re: No subject Dec 25, 2006, 09:02
Dec 25, 2006, 09:02
 
Sounds like some Europeans need some history lessons.

Try starting with Neville "We just need to talk with Hitler" Chamberlain. You people sound exactly like him.

Also, try pulling your heads out of your socialist asses and see that the vast majority of Muslims want you dead. Period. It's not what you or the US has done, it's who we are.

Why do they want you dead? Actually, it is very simple and has very little to do with any country's foreign policy. The fact is that those ME countries keep their populations controlled with an iron fist. Women are nothing. Life means nothing except when given to Allah. With global communications making the world accessible to the comman man, why would populations stay under control of these sexist nutballs? When you are a woman in the ME and see that Western contries elect women to power all the time and are wealthy and succesfull, why would you want to live under the yoke of a government that tells you you are nothing? Just the very existance of Western culture is a dire threat to most Islamic countries.

And, Americans give more to charities. The numbers you all are quoting are official government numbers. NOT personal contributions. Americans give to PRIVATE charity organizations. Those are generally not included in government reports.

This comment was edited on Dec 25, 09:03.
55.
 
No subject
Dec 23, 2006, 16:01
55.
No subject Dec 23, 2006, 16:01
Dec 23, 2006, 16:01
 
the GNP means jack shit compared to the pure dollar amount

You're missing the point. Those listed countries donate a proportion of their money, a higher proportion than the US. i.e. the US doesn't donate as much as it should and could.

Anyways, I don't know what you're all getting high and mighty about, Americans are a mix of British, French and Spanish. Native Americans own you

54.
 
Re: Coallition?
Dec 22, 2006, 21:25
54.
Re: Coallition? Dec 22, 2006, 21:25
Dec 22, 2006, 21:25
 
a) There is a difference between the government and the country. Do I like America? I've got some good mates who are yanks. Do I like the American government and the culture of greed that goes along with it? No.

Maybe there's a difference between the government of the US and the people but for sure all socialists are condescending know-it-alls. I've never met one or seen one on TV that wasn't.

Every socialist is exactly the same.

53.
 
Re: Coallition?
Dec 22, 2006, 19:40
53.
Re: Coallition? Dec 22, 2006, 19:40
Dec 22, 2006, 19:40
 

I'd just like to point out you're a complete total fuckwad retard jackass dipshit moron proving you don't know two shits anything at all. American foreign aid doesn't even amount to .5% of GNP.

Holland - 2.44%
Ireland - 1.83%
Norway - 1.49%
Switzerland - 1.09%
U.S.A. - .34%

How funny of you to go off on someone stating fact, when you are in fact the moron. Nice try dumbass. It's great of you to use an insignificant number that paints the situation the exact opposite of what it is. As several others have mentioned, the GNP means jack shit compared to the pure dollar amount, which will always be the only part that matters.

http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt/USAid.asp#ForeignAidNumbersinChartsandGraphs

Oh look at that, USA gives the most $, beating 2nd place by double. Can we give more? Of course. But don't be a fuckin jackass and pretend the contributions from the USA are insignificant or somehow inferior to other nations when they clearly aren't.

A much smaller % of a huge GNP is clearly a much bigger end result than others larger % of smaller GNP. Boo fuckin hoo the %'s don't match up. You're completely retarded for putting any weight into a % of something that varies wildly between countries, making the end result not even comparable.

Not going to get into the war, that is a fucked up mess we got ourselves into, with no end in sight from the worlds most prominent retard president.

This comment was edited on Dec 22, 19:47.
52.
 
Re: And...
Dec 22, 2006, 11:25
PHJF
 
52.
Re: And... Dec 22, 2006, 11:25
Dec 22, 2006, 11:25
 PHJF
 
Some people have trouble reading entire threads before throwing up their ignorance. Or you chose to ignore mine because it makes you look dumb.

It's the same fucking thing, you idiot. You think it's such a big deal when some company head is pulling down, personally, $100,000,000 a year that he donates $1,000,000? Who do you think heads up the MNCs that rape the third world? Sorry I destroyed your economy, here's a pittance off my paycheck.

------
"Oh how awful. Did he at least die peacefully? To shreds you say. Well, how's his wife holding up? To shreds you say."
Steam + PSN: PHJF
Avatar 17251
51.
 
And...
Dec 22, 2006, 09:58
51.
And... Dec 22, 2006, 09:58
Dec 22, 2006, 09:58
 
About the GDP thing: since ours is higher than most nations outside of the West, I'd think the respective absolute amount of money donated would be considerable compared to a nation with a lesser GDP but a higher percentage given.

50.
 
No kidding
Dec 22, 2006, 09:54
50.
No kidding Dec 22, 2006, 09:54
Dec 22, 2006, 09:54
 
It's just a friggin' game.

Some people really need to stop hating and/or being so jealous of America. And some Americans need to take a few things in stride. Some of us get so distraught over others ragging on our country to the point we sound little different from those very detractors. Hateful, prejudiced, pissant to a childish extent.

How about we all grow up, okay?

49.
 
Re: Coallition?
Dec 22, 2006, 09:25
49.
Re: Coallition? Dec 22, 2006, 09:25
Dec 22, 2006, 09:25
 
Some people have trouble reading entire threads before throwing up their ignorance. Or you chose to ignore mine because it makes you look dumb.

"There's always money in the banana stand." - George Sr.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
48.
 
Re: Coallition?
Dec 22, 2006, 08:55
PHJF
 
48.
Re: Coallition? Dec 22, 2006, 08:55
Dec 22, 2006, 08:55
 PHJF
 
No, but we give far more aid than any other nation on the planet.

I'd just like to point out you're a complete total fuckwad retard jackass dipshit moron proving you don't know two shits anything at all. American foreign aid doesn't even amount to .5% of GNP.

2003:

Holland - 2.44%
Ireland - 1.83%
Norway - 1.49%
Switzerland - 1.09%
U.S.A. - .34%

OH GOD, WE'RE SUCH GIVERS. <3 AMERICA SAVIOR OF THE WORLD.

Anyways.

America's Army is a fairly solid shooter. It's the best thing I've ever gotten from my federal tax dollars.

------
"Oh how awful. Did he at least die peacefully? To shreds you say. Well, how's his wife holding up? To shreds you say."
Steam + PSN: PHJF
Avatar 17251
47.
 
Re: Coallition?
Dec 22, 2006, 06:29
47.
Re: Coallition? Dec 22, 2006, 06:29
Dec 22, 2006, 06:29
 
d) Quite frankly since the fall of the Eastern Block, the thought processes of the American administration has become a liability to the rest of the world. They lost one enemy and, in a supreme effort to justify a massive defence budget, have found a new enemy to do battle with.

This is false. Not only has our military shrunk considerably (about 50%) since the fall of the Soviet Union, we really don't spend a huge amount on defense, at least in relation to our GDP. We rank #25 in the world in military spending as a percentage of our GDP.

You did a bang up job of making the world a safer place. The Islamic nations were pretty quiet before you had to stick your finger in the bloody bee hive. I'm not sure we really need you either

Were they now? I seem to remember the World Trade Center being bombed in 1993, the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia being hit in 1996, two of our embassies in Africa being bombed in 1998, and the USS Cole being attacked in 2000. Don't forget how Israel is constantly besieged by terror.

I guess when you meant "quiet" you were really only referring to yourself. I'm sorry it happened, but it wasn't our doing; it would be as if we held Europe responsible for the Japanese bombing at Pearl Harbor; after all, they were Germany's ally! Why didn't Europe handle it better?

46.
 
Re: Coalition?
Dec 22, 2006, 05:36
46.
Re: Coalition? Dec 22, 2006, 05:36
Dec 22, 2006, 05:36
 
this is just a complete lie. which is apparently all the news consists of in socialist europe and most of the world.
Or perhaps the rest of the world is right and it's YOU who are fed propaganda in the media to keep you ignorant of the truth?

But how would you tell? You are a product of what the media tell you.

Avatar 19028
45.
 
No subject
Dec 22, 2006, 02:10
45.
No subject Dec 22, 2006, 02:10
Dec 22, 2006, 02:10
 
While the US government may be be only 14 in GPD giving to charity, I'm pretty sure that American personal donations are near the top of the charts in percentage of wealth given away. I know that we give double what the Canadians give by percentage of personal wealth, thats the only statistic I could find quickly.

You also have to factor in the aid that the US military gives, which is not calculated into the statistic that is commonly referenced by America haters. You think that all of those planes and ships we sent for tsunami aid are cheap?


"There's always money in the banana stand." - George Sr.
This comment was edited on Dec 22, 02:10.
"Pants! Pants! Pants!"
64 Replies. 4 pages. Viewing page 1.
Newer [  1  2  3  4  ] Older