On Games for Windows - Blue's News Comments

On Games for Windows
[Dec 19, 2006, 11:24 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments

Games for Windows Vista how the new brand & OS will change PC gaming on Joystiq offers an updated preview of the new Games for Windows initiative, attempting, with limited success, to sort out what GFW represents besides a marketing slogan. Based on a tour of the program by Marketing Director Kevin Unangst and PR Manager Michael Wolf, they describe interoperability with Xbox 360 games via "Live Anywhere," how PCs will get numerical ratings to gauge how well they can play games, and what qualifies a game for the GFW logo. The conclusion they draw, however, is that it is difficult to draw conclusions about all this:

It's a risk. The Games for Windows strategy is on the verge of being schizophrenic. Can the cumbersome PC gaming experience really be simplified down to a console scheme? There are just too many freedoms and variations that exist in the PC universe to accurately interpret the PC as "the console that everybody already owns." It's not that simple. So is GFW a trick? Is Microsoft trying to lure back some of the consumers that were lost when Xbox was launched (an initiative that cannibalized PC gaming sales by design)?

The answer, like the Games For Windows vision, is not so clear. But there is most certainly the opportunity for Microsoft to create something very special. A cross-platform community where you and I can jump from Xbox to PC to our cell phones seamlessly. Anywhere.

View : : :

Post Comment

Search Log In

Search Log In Post Comment

29.

Re: As a game developer
Dec 19, 2006, 18:42

Jerykk

29.

Re: As a game developer Dec 19, 2006, 18:42

Dec 19, 2006, 18:42

Jerykk

Ah, yes, Live Anywhere hearkens back to the days of TEN and Mplayer (or was that Mplay? Can't remember). I still find it amazing that console players actually pay to play their games online... oh wait, no I don't. Console players also think Halo is the greatest FPS series ever made.

As for GFW, it doesn't mean crap unless MS starts releasing 360 and PC games at the same time. Though, even then, the PC version would be consolized.

To be fair, I can't really blame MS or all these other publishers for catering to the console kiddies. They are businesses and as such, they exist to make money. However, what I can blame are the console kiddies themselves for having such low standards. Dumb bastards. If they had simply recognized that Goldeneye and Halo were crap, the whole genre wouldn't have caught on and PCs would still be getting good shooters.