5.
 
Re: BR no bonus for some...
Dec 9, 2006, 18:51
5.
Re: BR no bonus for some... Dec 9, 2006, 18:51
Dec 9, 2006, 18:51
 
they wanted a powerful machine with lots of storage, thats what they got and are using right now.

But that's not my problem. If storage capacity is what they were after, then maybe a separate solution could've been conceived. Instead, Sony wanted to get the BR player out the most expedient way possible and included it with the PS3. So, essentially you're stuck with a high priced electronic you don't necessarily want (or need) and have to pay for the increased price if you want a PS3 at all.

I know Sony's already loosing a lot of money on each PS3 they sell, but come on.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
15.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
2.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
3.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
 5.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
  Re: BR no bonus for some...
6.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
7.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
8.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
9.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
10.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
11.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
12.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
17.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
14.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
4.
Dec 9, 2006Dec 9 2006
13.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
16.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
18.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
 Re:
19.
Dec 10, 2006Dec 10 2006
  Re:
20.
Dec 11, 2006Dec 11 2006
   Re: