Half of these things are insignificant, half of them are simply irrational.
Like Riley.
I heard ET:QW will not let you play until you submit a urine sample so that the evil marketers can determine our diet and which brands should have special ET:QW editions.
to find another game Riley won't be playing.I don't yet know if I will be playing it or not. It's going to depend on how the persistent stats and character features are implemented.
Microsoft could get me fired from my job because it looks like I'm incompetentYou being incompetent is certainly easy to believe. The notion that your employer could discover how many hours you have been "wasting" playing video games (even if it is not done on company time) from publicly posted stats and that it could negatively impact your career is also not far-fetched. Video games are still perceived as children's toys or frivolous entertainment to a lot of people especially older ones who also tend to hold senior positions in the business world.
A thread about ET:QW and we have Riley bitching about HL2... what a fucking surprise.Beamer brought it up so I responded to his post.
You obviously have a clear dislike for all modern computer gamesYou obviously only read the critical comments in my posts or think that Half-Life 2 is the only computer game.
Valve uses Steam and the voluntary survey to monitor system specs so that they can cater the game to the average systemThat is not analogous to what I am complaining about.
it deserves the same criticism if it too was in development as long as Half-Life 2 by a developer as wealthy as ValveA thread about ET:QW and we have Riley bitching about HL2... what a fucking surprise. You obviously have a clear dislike for all modern computer games so why do you even bother to hang around Bluesnews? If a game can monitor usage stats and use that to improve the game then that's fine by me... that way the game is catered to the users. Valve uses Steam and the voluntary survey to monitor system specs so that they can cater the game to the average system - that's why HL2 runs a lot smoother on current gen specs that most other games that have no point of reference. I have no doubt you'll turn that around as proof of Valve trying to destroy the gaming industry as we know it.
My point is that there is no need for mandatory player accounts or tracking with this type of game. I hope it's optional at most, but I certainly don't trust Activision or any other company to do just what's least intrusive or inconvenient to the customer because they usually don't.
I'm going to guess Google isn't your search engine of choice?It certainly won't be if it ever places video cameras in my neighborhood and starts archiving and posting that footage on its site.
I'm still waiting for him to start bitching about how you can pick up objects in Oblivion but never see your handsI don't have that game and have no intention of getting it. I can find other ways to be nickeled-and-dimed to death. If Obvlivion doesn't have first-person models to pickup objects that are not supposed to be magically levitated, then yes it deserves the same criticism if it too was in development as long as Half-Life 2 by a developer as wealthy as Valve.
But Riley doesn't like niggling little facts that contradict his wild fantasies.And what "wild fantasies" are those moron? Your posts in this thread clearly show that you just jump on the "hate Riley" bandwagon without actually reading (or at least comprehending) what I write. That must be Zathrus for you.
Even if he never played BF2 it wouldn't be difficult to do some research on its user and stats system once people brought them upBF2's stats system is irrelevant to the discussion because not only is this game not BF2, it's not even from the same developer or publisher.
But speaking of assumptions, is it safe to assume now that ET:QW is the next game where Riley jumps into every thread about it, trying to find a reason to ruin it for all the others?That's going to depend on whether Quake Wars requires Steam.