Oblivion Rating Change

ESRB Changes Oblivion's Rating to M announces a change in the ESRB rating for The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion to "M" for mature, the game had previously been rated "T" (teen). Word is: "The content causing the ESRB to change the rating involves more detailed depictions of blood and gore than were considered in the original rating, as well as the presence of a locked-out art file or 'skin' that, if accessed through a third party modification to the PC version of the game, allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters."
View : : :
38.
 
Re: No subject
May 3, 2006, 21:24
38.
Re: No subject May 3, 2006, 21:24
May 3, 2006, 21:24
 
Just so you all know, the original reason why women had to (and still do) wear long dresses to hide the legs and shape scarves and head coverings to hide their hair was to prevent these temptations for men. Because men are so weak, that they can't control themselves so they need to remove any temptation that may lead them to bad behavior.

If women didn't cover up, men would be raping them left and right. You only need to go to a nudist colony to see the rampant rape of women by men that see then naked ALL the time. Guys walk around with constant erections in nudist colonies.

This comment was edited on May 3, 22:06, are you happy now The_Truth?
This comment was edited on May 3, 22:17.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
2.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
20.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
28.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
49.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
3.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
4.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
5.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
7.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
6.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
8.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
9.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
43.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
45.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
52.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
62.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
71.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
10.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
31.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
33.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
34.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
35.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
36.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
37.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
 38.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
    Re: No subject
40.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
     Re: No subject
46.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
     Re: No subject
39.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
11.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
12.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
13.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
14.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
15.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
16.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
17.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
18.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
41.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
44.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
48.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
50.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
51.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
53.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
     Re: Ridiculous
58.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
      Re: Ridiculous
72.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
       Re: Ridiculous
75.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
        Re: Ridiculous
76.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
         Re: Ridiculous
77.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
          Re: Ridiculous
78.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
           Re: Ridiculous
79.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
           Re: Ridiculous
80.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
           Re: Ridiculous
81.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
          Re: Ridiculous
83.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
          Re: Ridiculous
85.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
           Re: Ridiculous
86.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
           Re: Ridiculous
82.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
         Re: Ridiculous
84.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
          Re: Ridiculous
63.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
64.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
65.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
     Re: Ridiculous
19.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
21.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
23.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
47.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
73.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
24.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
22.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
25.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
26.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
27.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
29.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
32.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
30.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
42.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
54.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
57.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
66.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
60.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
61.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
55.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
56.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
59.
May 3, 2006May 3 2006
67.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
68.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
74.
May 5, 2006May 5 2006
69.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
70.
May 4, 2006May 4 2006
87.
May 7, 2006May 7 2006