but Nintendo turned something like $800 million in pure profit last year
Last quarter actually if you can believe it. Also, the bit about the GameCube X2 specs is highly suspect to say the least. If you are basing that information off an IGN article that came out recently, there were a number of factors such as architecture in that article that the author chose to ignore. He based his comparisons purely off Mhz numbers which as we all know from Intel/AMD, is no longer a relevant way to measure it. Will the system be nearly as powerful as Xbox 360 or PS3? I highly doubt it, but that's not what they're going for. Personally, I've always been a "graphics don't make the game" person and while I still like eye candy, if the games are superior on this system, I don't really care much if they look as good as GRAW on the 360. And I can tell you that the casual gamers/non-gamers that Nintendo is targeting with this system probably don't even know what "next-gen" system look like anyway, nor do they really care if this system has HD or not. A lot of people laughed at the Nintendo DS as well which went for changing the way people play games and it's destroying right now. This one (inspite of the stupid name) may still surprise people. I'm still half-convinced that this "Wii" thing is just a viral marketing thing to get people talking about it and that another name will be anounced at E3. Remember how Nintendo DS was also just a code-name? Then there were rumours about it changing to Nintendo Nitro and then Nintendo said they were just keeping DS. That might happena gain.
Parallax Abstraction
Ottawa, Canada
GO SENS GO!
GO HABS GO!
Parallax Abstraction
Twitch |
YouTube |
Podcast