Duke Nukem Forever Pot-stirring

Gamasutra relates a recent update on the status of Duke Nukem Forever from George Broussard, quoting him from the May issue of Computer Games Magazine saying: "The problem is that when we show it, people are going to be like, 'Yeah, whatever'. Honestly, at this point we just want to finish it." An interesting note is that 3D Realms is apparently due a $500,000 royalty payment if the game is released by the end of this year, though this may not be a big factor considering it is the balance of a royalty for which $4.25 million has already been paid.
View : : :
25.
 
Re: No subject
Apr 13, 2006, 12:40
25.
Re: No subject Apr 13, 2006, 12:40
Apr 13, 2006, 12:40
 
I'm just wondering who is dumb enough to keep fronting money for the dev team to keep working on this project? Seriously, who is stupid enough to keep pumping money into a game studio that has been working on the same game for nine years and hasn't produced anything?

Probably the same dumb asses that pumped money into the Phantom System.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
3.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
27.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
28.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
29.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
86.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
2.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
4.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
5.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
15.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
16.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
73.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
35.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
38.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
 25.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
  Re: No subject
36.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
37.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
41.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
42.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
     Re: No subject
43.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
      Re: No subject
44.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
       Re: No subject
46.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
     Re: No subject
67.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
     Re: No subject
64.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
70.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
71.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
6.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
7.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
9.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
8.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
10.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
11.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
12.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
13.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
14.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
17.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
18.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
23.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
30.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
31.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
20.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
21.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
32.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
45.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
63.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
22.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
24.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
26.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
34.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
40.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
65.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
47.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
51.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
53.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
48.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
49.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
50.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
52.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
54.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
57.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
58.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
72.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
     Re: No subject
59.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
60.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
62.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
68.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
     Re: No subject
69.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
      Re: No subject
55.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
56.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
61.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
66.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
74.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
75.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
76.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
77.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
78.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
79.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
80.
Apr 13, 2006Apr 13 2006
81.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
82.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
83.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
85.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
87.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
     Re: No subject
88.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
      Re: No subject
92.
Apr 17, 2006Apr 17 2006
93.
Apr 17, 2006Apr 17 2006
     Re: No subject
94.
Apr 17, 2006Apr 17 2006
      Re: No subject
89.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
90.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
95.
Apr 20, 2006Apr 20 2006
84.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006
91.
Apr 14, 2006Apr 14 2006