XP on Macs

Apple Launches Software to Run Windows XP is the announcement (wisely not released on April 1) announcing a patch for Intel-based Macs to boot either MacOS or Windows XP:
The computer maker said its new "Boot Camp" software is available as a download beginning Wednesday. It allows users with a Microsoft Windows XP installation disc to install Windows XP on an Intel-based Mac computer.

"Apple has no desire or plan to sell or support Windows, but many customers have expressed their interest to run Windows on Apple's superior hardware now that we use Intel processors," Philip Schiller, Apple senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, said in a statement.

Boot Camp makes it easier to install Windows software on an Intel-based Mac, with a step-by-step guide. It also lets users choose to use either Mac OS X software, or the Windows software when they restart their computer.

Users can download the new Boot Camp software from Apple's Web site. A final version of Boot Camp will be available as a feature in the upcoming Mac OS X version 10.5 "Leopard."
View : : :
80.
 
Re: Mac on XP
Apr 7, 2006, 12:38
80.
Re: Mac on XP Apr 7, 2006, 12:38
Apr 7, 2006, 12:38
 
Jesus Christ you are thick.

THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU SAID! REREAD WHAT I QUOTED! ALL YOU SAID WAS THAT SINCE THERE WAS ONLY ONE VERSION IT SHOULD BE COMPARED TO THE FULLY FEATURED WINDOWS VERSION!

It wasn't until I asked that you pointed out which version it is actually closest to! Your original point was that there was only one version, and I called that moronic logic.

AND I NEVER ONCE DISAGREED WITH YOU OVER WHICH ONE IT WAS CLOSEST TO, I JUST SAID YOUR LOGIC WAS MORONIC!

So I gather this is just your roundabout way of saying "yes, MeatForce, I am indeed just chapping your nuts"?

As far as I can tell, this all started because I used the imprecise phrase "XP Pro=mandatory because Apple doesn't make an 'OSX Home Edition'", and since you didn't really know what I meant by that, you assumed my only rationale for doing so was "jacking up the price of the dell." Right?

Well just because you didn't understand what I was saying the first time I said it, doesn't mean the logic is moronic, and saying so only presents you as a jerk. There is nothing wrong with the logic behind my assertion that a comparison between OSX and XP Pro is much more fair than a comparison between OSX and XP Home. It seems as though even you can see the sense in that once it's been more adequately explained.

What's moronic is saying shit like

Incidentally, there's no "OSX Pro Edition," so your logic would make XP Home = mandatory.

Because not only does that have nothing whatsoever to do with my logic, but you're simply ignoring the fact that feature-wise OSX is "OSX Pro Edition". It's a very advanced feature-rich OS that's at least the equal of the best Microsoft has to offer at the moment, which is something I thought was plain common knowledge. Since that offering is quite clearly NOT XP Home, I trusted folks would just be able to put 2+2 together and figure out that's what I was talking about..

My mistake. I'll try to be more clear in the future.

As for webcams, you're flat-out wrong about many people using them daily.

OK, so I'm wrong then. The fact that Google returns 156,000,000 hits for the word "webcam", but only 146,000,000 hits for the word "porn" clearly bears this out.

Do I give a rat's ass? Not a bit. It's irrelevant.

The presence of a webcam is still a bonus feature for the Mac, so why the hell wouldn't I have included it on a list of pros/cons?


-----
It may be that one day a young man will adore a Pinata.
This comment was edited on Apr 7, 12:46.
-----
I'm not even angry. I'm being so sincere right now, even though you broke my heart and killed me.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
4.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
66.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
68.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
69.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
2.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
11.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
12.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
15.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
16.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
   mac os
21.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
    Re: mac os
17.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
18.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
19.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
     Re: No subject
20.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
22.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
23.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
     Re: No subject
24.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
      Re: No subject
28.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
       Re: No subject
25.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
26.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
27.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
29.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
     Re: No subject
31.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
      Re: No subject
32.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
      Re: No subject
35.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
      Re: No subject
38.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
       Re: No subject
39.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
        Re: No subject
40.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
         Re: No subject
43.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
        Re: No subject
44.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
         Re: No subject
34.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
     Re: No subject
36.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
      Re: No subject
37.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
      Re: No subject
42.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
      Re: No subject
45.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
       Re: No subject
49.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
        Re: No subject
52.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
         Re: No subject
53.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
        Re: No subject
47.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
       Re: No subject
57.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
        Re: No subject
63.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
         Re: No subject
70.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
          Re: No subject
75.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
         Re: No subject
76.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
          Re: No subject
77.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
          Re: No subject
54.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
       Re: No subject
56.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
        Re: No subject
58.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
         Re: No subject
60.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
          Re: No subject
61.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
           Re: No subject
62.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
            Re: No subject
64.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
             Re: No subject
73.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
              Re: No subject
50.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
3.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
5.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
6.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
7.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
8.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
51.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
9.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
10.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
13.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
14.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
30.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
33.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
41.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
46.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
48.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
55.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
59.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
65.
Apr 5, 2006Apr 5 2006
67.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
71.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
72.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
74.
Apr 6, 2006Apr 6 2006
   Re: If...
78.
Apr 7, 2006Apr 7 2006
79.
Apr 7, 2006Apr 7 2006
 80.
Apr 7, 2006Apr 7 2006
  Re: Mac on XP
81.
Apr 7, 2006Apr 7 2006
82.
Apr 7, 2006Apr 7 2006
83.
Apr 7, 2006Apr 7 2006
     Re: Mac on XP
84.
Apr 7, 2006Apr 7 2006