Where is the disconnect that is preventing you from understanding that since there is only one version of OSX on the market - and that version is fully capable of doing everything and anything Apple has ever said OSX can do (like XP Pro; you're not going to get it home and discover it won't run on a multiprocessor machine, for example) - I feel it would be unfair to compare it feature-wise to a version of XP that is missing features??????????
Jesus Christ you are thick.
THAT'S NOT WHAT YOU SAID! REREAD WHAT I QUOTED! ALL YOU SAID WAS THAT SINCE THERE WAS ONLY ONE VERSION IT SHOULD BE COMPARED TO THE FULLY FEATURED WINDOWS VERSION!
It wasn't until I asked that you pointed out which version it is actually closest to! Your original point was that there was only one version, and I called that moronic logic.
AND I NEVER ONCE DISAGREED WITH YOU OVER WHICH ONE IT WAS CLOSEST TO, I JUST SAID YOUR LOGIC WAS MORONIC!
As for webcams, you're flat-out wrong about many people using them daily. A handful, tops. Why do you think webcam technology hasn't improved in 7 or 8 years? Why do you think they're so low-res? Why do you think so few digital cameras have webcam capabilities?
Because no one uses webcams! There's no market for them therefore no one invests money into their development-------------
Doomriders: the first new band worth a signature -
http://www.deathwishinc.com/