Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Chicago, IL 11/17

Regularly scheduled events

NVIDIA Gets Physical

NVIDIA and Havok Demonstrate World's First GPU-Powered Game Physics Solution at Game Developer's Conference announces plans for Havok physics support in upcoming NVIDIA accelerators:

SANTA CLARA, Calif., March 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- NVIDIA Corporation (Nasdaq: NVDA - News), the worldwide leader in programmable graphics processor technologies, and Havok, the game industry's leading supplier of cross- platform middleware, will be demonstrating a physics effects solution that runs completely on a graphics processing unit (GPU) -- an industry first -- at this year's Game Developer Conference (GDC) in San Jose, California (March 21st through 24th).

The result of an ongoing engineering collaboration between Havok and NVIDIA, this new software product from Havok -- called Havok FX(TM) -- enables the simulation of dramatically-detailed physical phenomena in PC games, when powered by GPUs such as NVIDIA GeForceŽ7 or 6 Series GPUs and further amplified with NVIDIA SLI multi-GPU technology. The Havok FX product is currently in early release to select developers and is expected to be available this summer.

38. This could help PhysX Mar 20, 2006, 19:52 Shadowcat
I see a lot of people saying that this will kill PhysX, but I beg to differ.

The problem with the first dedicated physics card is that the market for it is tiny. Game developers can't make games that require it because few people will have one, so the initial uses for it will be just a bit of added glitz. I want it to become prevalent due to the long-term benefits, but it seems like a hard sell even to me.

But if nVidia can add hardware-accelerated physics with nothing more than a driver update, suddenly there's a vast customer base with hardware-accelerated physics already in their machine. That means developers actually have a market to develop for, and the hardest problem for PhysX is suddenly solved by someone else! (provided the two approaches are sufficiently compatible).

So 'all' the PhysX guys have to do is create a superior solution.

The games will come, and if CPU+GPU+PPU gives you better performance than just CPU+GPU then people will buy that PPU.

edit: oops, I see that Beamer actually said a lot of this already.
This comment was edited on Mar 20, 19:57.
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Mar 20, 09:43 Cool MeatForce
  2. Mar 20, 09:47  Re: Cool Billy Bob
  3. Mar 20, 09:57   Re: Cool Kevlar
  4. Mar 20, 10:18    Re: Cool Masa
  6. Mar 20, 10:30     Re: Cool Zathrus
  7. Mar 20, 10:35      Re: Cool Masa
  8. Mar 20, 10:36      Re: Cool MMORPGHoD
  9. Mar 20, 10:45      Re: Cool SirKnight
  10. Mar 20, 11:02       Re: Cool Zathrus
  12. Mar 20, 11:22       Re: Cool MMORPGHoD
  13. Mar 20, 12:15        Re: Cool Parallax Abstraction
  15. Mar 20, 12:52         Re: Cool Ratty
  17. Mar 20, 13:16          Re: Cool MMORPGHoD
  20. Mar 20, 13:28           Re: Cool Rigs
  18. Mar 20, 13:21          Re: Cool Zathrus
  23. Mar 20, 13:56           Re: Cool War
  25. Mar 20, 14:13            Re: Cool Zathrus
  27. Mar 20, 14:35             Re: Cool moritz-s
  34. Mar 20, 15:21              Re: Cool Zathrus
  29. Mar 20, 14:51            Re: Cool Fartacus
  31. Mar 20, 15:05             Re: Cool Ratty
  35. Mar 20, 15:34              Re: Cool Fartacus
  36. Mar 20, 16:26               Re: Cool Beamer
  11. Mar 20, 11:15  Re: Cool MindTrigger
  26. Mar 20, 14:33   Re: Cool John
  28. Mar 20, 14:37    Re: Cool BIGtrouble77
  32. Mar 20, 15:15     Re: Cool DedEye
  5. Mar 20, 10:27 No subject Elf Shot The Food
  14. Mar 20, 12:48 Video input ExcessDan
  19. Mar 20, 13:23  Re: Video input Zathrus
  21. Mar 20, 13:34   Re: Video input ExcessDan
  22. Mar 20, 13:40    Re: Video input Rigs
  24. Mar 20, 14:09     Re: Video input ExcessDan
  16. Mar 20, 12:54 No subject Acleacius
  30. Mar 20, 15:03 re: one of the first comments Dev
  33. Mar 20, 15:19 More for the GPU? Ahnteis
  37. Mar 20, 16:38  Re: More for the GPU? Rigs
  44. Mar 21, 01:13   Re: More for the GPU? ExcessDan
>> 38. Mar 20, 19:52 This could help PhysX Shadowcat
  39. Mar 20, 20:25  Re: This could help PhysX Dev
  40. Mar 20, 21:35   Re: This could help PhysX SquirrelZero
  41. Mar 20, 21:46    Re: This could help PhysX Fartacus
  42. Mar 20, 21:52     Re: This could help PhysX SquirrelZero
  43. Mar 20, 22:26      Re: This could help PhysX Fartacus
  45. Mar 21, 01:29       Re: This could help PhysX Shadowcat
  46. Mar 21, 03:02        Re: This could help PhysX SquirrelZero
  47. Mar 21, 09:14         Re: This could help PhysX Fartacus
  48. Mar 21, 09:24        Re: This could help PhysX Fartacus

Blue's News is a participant in Amazon Associates programs
and earns advertising fees by linking to Amazon.


Blue's News logo