Mail Links! | Thanks Mike Martinez and Ant. |
Play: | Deal or No Deal. |
Link: | Vincent Gallo Merchandise. Thanks WarPig. |
Story: | Isaac Hayes Quits 'South Park'. So long, childrens. |
Science!: |
Nanotech
helps blind hamsters see. Reactions: Applying Math and Counting the Cups (registration required). Building Better Bones With Ice. |
Media: |
Best home made lighsaber
dual ever. Full Contact Cheerleading. 1964 Rolling Stones Rice Krispy Commercial. |
Follow-up: | Alabama Cow Tests Positive for Mad Cow. |
I was referring to your statement that science can explain everything in the universe. Perhaps science can. But isn't it taking to an extreme (or maybe even taking a leap of faith) to say that science can explain EVERYTHING out there, despite the vast unknowns in the universe around us and that beyond the near? I believe science is the best belief system because it supports its assertions with fact but perhaps there could exist things beyond the scope and extension of science. My point being: science can be dogmatic, too. It's not just religious zealots who take things on faith. I think most people believe in Einstein's theory of relativity, but how many of us understand the mathematical proof behind it? The vast, vast majority do not. Yet we believe in it (even if it is somewhat counterintuitive) because big smart scientists told us it was so.